Lindsey Neal Photography + Fine Art
  • Anew Light Creatives
    • Contact Me
    • Testimonials
  • Anew Light Photo
    • Weddings
    • Lifestyle Sessions
    • Preparation
  • Anew Light Fine Art
    • Paintings for sale
    • Purchase Art
  • Ministry
    • Anew Light Ministries
    • Benefits of Therapeutic Art
    • Sponsor a Missions Trip
    • Blog
  • Education
    • My Background
    • Integrated Art Education
    • My work

Jesus Resurrection...

7/27/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
According to the New Testament, the resurrection of Yeshua after his crucifixion and death is God’s confirmation of the Messiah’s divine authority over life and over death.

Throughout history the Messianic faith has had to stand its ground against Bible criticism, historical research, and of course, attacks of the rabbis: all trying to refute the fact of Yeshua’s resurrection from the dead. While each and every one of us will be here only for a short time, for a few decades, our lives are like a “layover”, or an exam, if you like, but the Messiah is unique; an exception, because he conquered death.

Yeshua’s resurrection is without a doubt one of the greatest miracles in history. Or … the most clever deception that fooled millions of people. 

Many have tried to refute the fact of  Yeshua’s resurrection from the dead. All of this because if Yeshua did indeed rise from the dead, it would mean that he really is the Messiah and that the NT is right. And if Yeshua did not rise from the dead? Then we and millions of others are living in an illusion.

According to the Bible, the life, death and resurrection of the Jew Yeshua from Nazareth split time in two. His crucifixion became the most famous death in history and caused a revolution that started in Jerusalem and reached the ends of the earth. Three days after his death and burial Yeshua rose from the dead and his grave was found empty. After this it is told that within 40 days he appeared to many people throughout all of Israel, including groups of more than 500 people.

The rumor about the Jewish Messiah who died for man’s sin, conquered death and rose again started to spread fast.

The Romans couldn’t explain the fact that his body had disappeared from the grave. On the other hand, the rabbis during Yeshua’s time claimed that Yeshua performed supernatural miracles and wonders by the power of Satan. The problem with this claim is that God would not raise a false Messiah from the dead, for the Eternal One of Israel hates falsehood.

Many skeptics tried to come up with theories on this matter. We collected them and now will go through them – one by one.

MAYBE ALL OF THIS NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED?Maybe this was made up hundreds of years later? The problem with this is that contemporary historians including Yeshua’s enemies do mention him and this event. Besides all this, natural science also confirms the historicity of the event as described in the gospel of Matthew. Matthew, describing the crucifixion of Yeshua states the following:

“Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land until the ninth hour. And the earth shook, and the rocks were split. The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.” (Matthew 27:45 & 51-52)

In his book “Pontius Pilate”, Dr. Paul Maier, an historian at Harvard University, quotes from a letter written by Tiberius to prefect Pontius Pilate. This letter was written around 30 AD. Look at what he writes:

“What I wanted to ask you about is the mysterious celestial incident that occurred Friday afternoon after the month of April. A thick darkness moved towards us coming from the southeastern horizon of the Mediterranean Sea, and darkened our skies for several hours.” (Dr. Paul Maier, “Pontius Pilate”, p. 244)

Dr. Paul Maier adds that Pontius Pilate answered in a letter:
“Regarding the darkness, it indeed covered all of Judah during the indicated time. However, the local astrologer simply can’t explain it. The darkness was accompanied by an earthquake. Still, the darkness continues to be a complete mystery.” (p. 244)

Therefore, both science and history support the record that the day of Yeshua’s crucifixion was a strange day. Just like the NT says.

Okay, so all of this happened.

MAYBE THEY JUST CHECKED THE WRONG GRAVE?If that was the case, the Roman rulers and the rabbis would have quickly pointed out the right grave. 

MAYBE THE APPEARANCE OF YESHUA WAS SIMPLY A HALLUCINATION IN SOME INTOXICATED MINDS?Maybe that could happen to a small group of people. But to hundreds, even thousands of people, over a period of 40 days? Also, this would not explain where the corpse went.
SO, MAYBE YESHUA SIMPLY PASSED OUT FOR A WHILE AND LATER RECOVERED?See for example what rabbi Daniel Asor says:

“And who says that Yeshu simply experienced clinical death and woke up in the grave and regained consciousness? Do we have a way to disprove this? Maybe, at this time, they did not determine death properly? And he was just not  actually dead?”

The eyewitnesses of the NT knew very well the circumstances of the resurrection. According to the Jewish tradition, Yeshua’s body was wrapped in shrouds and anointed with spices. About 40 kilos of spices and resin were mixed together, forming a thick, sticky texture, like rubber, which hardened on the body. The opening of the grave was blocked with an enormous stone, weighing two tons. In the wake of the uproar that took place in Jerusalem during Yeshua’s crucifixion the religious leaders, the Pharisees, remembered that Yeshua spoke about rising to life after three days. They certainly made sure that their people would keep an eye on the grave. Moreover, they demanded that Pilate should station soldiers to guard the grave. Along with the Roman guards the grave was sealed with a Roman seal. Had someone dared to move the stone from the grave the seal would have been broken and the transgressor would have had to face the wrath of the Roman rulers. And the guards, failing to protect the grave, would have been punished.

Also from a philosophical standpoint this theory doesn’t make sense. Consider what the scientist David Strauss wrote about 200 years ago:

“This idea that a creature creeping out of his own grave, ‘half dead’, sick and weak, in urgent need of medical treatment, clothing, recuperation and support, would succeed to awake in his disciples the impression of being the Prince of Life and conqueror of death and grave; an impression that was the foundation of their future actions, this idea is simply unreasonable. Such a resurrection would only weaken the disciples’ impression, make them sad and cause disappointment. And certainly not turn their grief into excitement, nor their fear into worship.” (Dr. Strauss)

Rabbi Asor’s claim is not only illogical from a philosophical and historical point of view but also from a scientific point of view. John describes something that only today science can explain. When Yeshua was crucified, a Roman soldier pierced his side. In the NT John explains:

“But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water.” (John 19:34)

2000  years ago this certainly seemed odd. Why did John bother pointing this out?
Today, we know what physiology teaches: When a human dies the blood in his body separates into serum: a transparent liquid like water and red blood cells. Without knowing, John proved scientifically that Yeshua was indeed dead.
Okay, so he really died.

BUT MAYBE HIS DISCIPLES STOLE THE CORPSE?Anyone who knows about the Roman guard system, knows that this is impossible. Ancient Roman soldiers would never let this happen; out of fear for their own lives. Let’s suppose Yeshua’s  disciples managed to trick the soldiers or somehow drug them.

Moving a stone weighing two tons would alert everyone, awake or asleep. And if that were the case, immediately the rabbis of the Sanhedrin as well as the Roman authorities, would have made a public outcry and retrieved the stolen corpse in front of everyone.

This obviously, did not happen.

And don’t forget that Yeshua was buried in the grave of the Sanhedrin member, Joseph of Arimathea. Which means that next to the Roman guards there were others that had an eye on the grave.

Furthermore, the stolen corpse theory fails to explain away how Yeshua appeared to so many people and over such a long period of time.

By the way, if today it is almost impossible to make a corpse disappear how much more so back in that day without elaborate technology or getaway cars.

Pay attention to what Dr. Jeff Burkes says, a famous Jewish surgeon from New York, who won an award thanks to his expertise in identifying bodies in the wake of the attack on the Twin Towers on 9/11. As a Jew, he decided to publish his story and argues, among other things, that after thoroughly examining the matter of Yeshua’s resurrection he came to the conclusion that Yeshua is indeed the Messiah:

“Yeshua’s resurrection is real. With all the archaeology and technology nobody ever could find his body. And it’s almost impossible to get rid of a corpse. And if his resurrection is true everything he said is true as well. Therefore, He is the promised Jewish Messiah.” (Dr. Jeff Burkes)

BUT MAYBE THE MOST CONVINCING TESTIMONY IS THE LIFE OF THE FIRST BELIEVERS, AFTER THE RESURRECTED YESHUA APPEARED TO THEM. IN THEIR EXCITEMENT, THEY BEGAN TRAVELING THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, FULL OF ENERGY, JOY, HOPE AND OPTIMISM.  They worked miracles and wonders in the name of Yeshua in front of everyone. Miracles that even the Talmud describes as supernatural. They gave up their own honor, their possessions, their social status and as it seems, also many of their relationships.

And for what? To be scorned, cursed, persecuted, to be beaten and stoned and eventually die as lions’ prey, on the cross, being stoned and burned alive by those trying to silence them.

But even then, they were full of joy and thanksgiving and sang praise songs to God. They were people of peace, never used violence or forced their faith on anyone. On the contrary, they were so sure of their faith in Yeshua that they were willing to even die for his name. And also today, whoever believes in Yeshua the Messiah has the same absolute certainty just like those Messianic Jews 2000 years ago: That the crucified Messiah conquered death and granted us eternal life.

IN A SENSE, YESHUA RISING FROM THE DEAD WASN’T MEANT TO BE A BIG SURPRISE SINCE THE BIBLE ALREADY GAVE US PROPHECIES ABOUT HIS RESURRECTION.  To see for example a video about the prophecy in Isaiah 53 about the rejection, death and resurrection of the Messiah, follow this link. If all this is so, we should not be surprised that in 2nd temple Judaism they expected that when the Messiah comes he’ll die and rise again.

Professor Israel Knohl scholar for religion from Hebrew University, Jerusalem decoded an archaeological inscription, dated before Christ, that points to a vision about the resurrection of a messianic leader. The stone inscription was named “Vision of Gabriel”. Pay attention to this: Professor Knohl explains that the angel Gabriel will three days after his death resurrect a messianic leader, called “Prince of Princes”. He is the leader of Israel. Professor Knohl says:

“It can be determined that when the vision was written, at the end of the 1st century BC, prevailed in some circles the view that the Messiah’s death and resurrection after three days is a vital part of the salvation plan. Therefore, if there was a Jewish tradition of a resurrected Messiah we understand Yeshu as the national Jewish Messiah that is going to his death.” (Prof. Israel Knohl)
Amazing, isn’t it?
​

Long before the rabbinical tradition seized control over Judaism the people of Israel believed that the Messiah had to die and rise from the dead on the third day, just as it happened with Yeshua. Yeshua conquered for us humanity’s biggest enemy: death. So that we would inherit eternal life. And before he ascended, he promised that the Holy Spirit, just as he dwelled in the temple, will dwell in those who believe in him. And he can live in you as well!

​


0 Comments

Jesus came to oppose the rising religious oppression...

7/27/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
WHAT IF THE ACTUAL REASON WHY THE RABBIS REJECTED JESUS IS BEING HIDDEN FROM YOU? 

What if Jesus is the best kept secret in Judaism, hidden on purpose from all of us?

We all are witnesses of the exclusiveness that the Rabbis created for themselves in their tradition. But this is not something new. It was like that already 2000 years ago.

Jesus was the only one who dared to stand up against the religious oppression by breaking down the walls that rabbinical tradition had put up. Jesus opened the door to God for everyone: for the simple ones and even for the Gentiles. And so today, thanks to Jesus, millions of Gentiles from all over the world, from different cultures and countries, believe in the God of Israel and find a future, hope, comfort, joy and everlasting life in the very same Jew who lived here, in Israel, 2000 years ago. (We dedicated another video to the fact that the Rabbis depict Jesus as a sorcerer who led Israel into idolatry that you can watch here.)

NOW WE WOULD LIKE TO REVEAL THE ACTUAL REASON WHY JESUS WAS REJECTED BY THE RELIGIOUS LEADERS OF HIS TIME.

Contrary to the rabbinical explanation and according to the descriptions in the New Testament gospels, the actual reason why the Pharisees rejected Jesus as Messiah lies in the fact that the religious leaders of his time were corrupt. All they cared about was control, power and to make money at the expense of the people. Jesus threatened the exclusiveness of the sect which they had created. They knew that if the people of Israel accepted and followed Jesus, they’d lose their power, their influence, their control, their honored position and of course, their source of income.

But how can we know who was right?

It’s actually not that hard at all. First, let’s go 2000 years back in time. While the religious leaders at Jesus’ time, the Rabbis, were busy coming up with legalistic traditions and rules, isolating their  people from the world and defying the Gentiles, Jesus on the other hand, talked about grace, modesty, compassion and love. While the Rabbis were busy with oppressing and intimidating the people making them view God as some kind of moral monster who only wants to punish, Jesus talked openly about the fact that all need the love and forgiveness of God.

Forgiveness that is based on God’s grace and compassion, not on our own human attempts to impress him with all kinds of ceremonies and habits. 
Where others threw stones, Jesus forgave.

While others blamed the poor for their own suffering, Jesus had fellowship with the outcasts, willingly listened to their troubles, healed the lepers and ate with the families of the rejected ones.

Where others only saw prostitutes, tax collectors and worthless fishermen, Jesus saw a group of people with the potential to change the world.

Like every religion, the religion of the rabbinical tradition tries to develop the idea that God cares only about the members of their sect and hates the rest of the world. They wanted to make all of Israel believe that God cares only about Jews. In fact, the Rabbis have been claiming for 2000 years that only the Jews are important and that God doesn’t care about Gentiles, that they are not important and that their purpose lies in serving us, the Jews. 

Jesus stood up against the claim that there is a group of people who are better or more important in God’s eyes than other people. No matter if they’re Rabbis or Popes, Jesus and the NT calls them to love, grace and compassion, mercy and peace among people. This threatened the intimidation and the oppression imposed by the rabbinical tradition.

AND WHAT ABOUT YOU?Are you offended by Jesus’ sayings?
Like this one:

“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God… Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you…” (Matthew Chap. 5, NT)

Or how about this request of the NT:

“Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another…” (Epistle to the Ephesians, Chap. 4, NT)
Does that really sound bad?

Whoever takes courage and reads the NT will notice that Jesus was gentle, modest, sensitive, compassionate, loving and showed great kindness and compassion.

But what did make him angry was the use of God’s name in vain and the religious oppression on the part of the Rabbis of his time. 

They were coming up with rules, habits, ceremonies and strange traditions that were forced upon the simple people, claiming that this is God’s will. They took power for themselves and controlled the people by spreading fear and threatening economically those who followed them. And all this was done in God’s name.

Sound familiar?

POWER CORRUPTS
​
Many of the Rabbis of the Sanhedrin and the priests of Jesus’ time were hypocritical, corrupt, liars, and thieves. Their deeds, done in God’s name, were in contradiction to the OT. But Jesus was not the only one who thought that way. Reading, for example, what Josephus wrote, a Jewish historian at the time of the 2nd temple, we see that this was a dark time of political corruption and wickedness. 

The high priests’ appointments were purely political, based on power and manipulation, and the temple had become a marketplace. When they noticed that Jesus had power to perform miracles in the name of the God of Israel and that they could not, they became jealous and feared to lose their position. They did not want to lose their power and control over the people of Israel. They did not want to lose their honorable position and the respect they received from so many people. And they knew that if the people of Israel were to follow Jesus, the Messiah, they would lose everything. And for that reason the religious leaders of rabbinical Judaism 2000 years ago, and until today, reject Jesus and the fact that he’s the Messiah. 

The Dead Sea Scrolls, dated to the Second Temple period, also contain severe criticism against the corrupt leaders of Judaism of that time.

This might be hard to believe, but even the Talmud, Tractate Pesachim 57, admits and attacks with determination the corruption among the priestly families in Israel at the time of Jesus. 

In a lecture given by Professor Rachel Elior, Hebrew University, on the Dead Sea Scrolls, she says that the mere discovery of these scrolls in the Judean Desert, is proof of the poor condition the temple priesthood was in. According to Elior, scrolls written by the Sadducean priesthood describe how they had to flee for their lives and hide from the new priests who replaced them by force. In Prof. Elior’s opinion, when we find in the scrolls references to a war between “Sons of Light” and “Sons of Darkness,” the “Sons of Darkness” are the corrupt priests who caused a spiritual decay and the destruction of the temple.  

According to the book of Numbers, chapter 20, the priesthood was supposed to be passed on from father to son, and the High Priest ministered until the day of his death. However, according to the Encyclopaedia Hebraica, the spiritual leadership in Israel during the Second Temple period was so corrupt that the appointment of the High Priest was controlled by a group of rich and privileged priestly families from which most of the priests came. According to Tractate Yoma 8 and 9, the high priests bought their position from the political rulers and took turns every year.

In other words, the Sages themselves admit that the spiritual leadership at Jesus’ time was corrupt. 

They used to harass the people without mercy. The way the NT writings describe the level of corruption that the Rabbis and priests had reached during the Second Temple period is being backed up both from historical sources and the Talmud itself. 

This is what Jesus fought against. And because of that he was rejected by the religious leaders. 

It’s important to understand that just like the prophets in the OT, one of the tasks of the Messiah was to point out the sins of the religious leaders, rebuke them and show the people their real face. So is it really that surprising that they rejected and killed him?

BUT GLADLY ENOUGH, GOD IS AN EXPERT IN TURNING BITTER INTO SWEET. He used the rejection and the death of the Messiah to bring about healing and forgiveness.

Just like the sacrifice on the altar offered in the temple for the sins of the people, so is the Messiah the eternal sacrifice. Not only for our sin but for the sins of the whole world. The blood that was shed because of our sin has made for us a new covenant. 

Rabbi Isaac Liechtenstein, who lived in the 20th century, main rabbi of Hungary, was willing to swim against the tide. Though it was forbidden, he read the NT. These are his words:

“I used to think that the NT is an unclean book, a source of pride selfishness, hate, antisemitism and violence. But when I opened this book, I felt it capture my heart in a special and wonderful way. All of a sudden glory and light filled my soul. I was looking for thorns, but I found roses, pearls instead of stones, I found love instead of hate. Instead of revenge, I found forgiveness. Liberty, instead of slavery.” (Rabbi Isaac Liechtenstein)
​

Amazing, right?

When a Rabbi shows courage and instead of blindly following the habit of rejecting the Messiah hereads the NT with an open heart, his life changes completely. He does not try anymore to force rules and odd traditions on people as if we could impress God by doing so. Rather, he understands that the peace the Messiah has come to give is first of all internal, for only in that way can our relationship with God be restored.
​

To sum it up: Since the corrupt religious leaders of Jesus’ time did not want to lose their power and control, they didn’t have another choice but to reject God’s Messiah and to get rid of him. However, God used this to bring a perfect sacrifice, forgiveness and atonement.

Thanks to the Messiah, this good news would not be exclusive but spread throughout all the nations of the earth. The Jewish Messiah became a blessing to the Gentiles. This God who created, upholds and loves all of his creation loves so much that he revealed himself to humanity and gave his life in the person of the Messiah, for Jews and Gentiles.

ONE for Israel 

https://www.oneforisrael.org/bible-based-teaching-from-israel/the-untold-reason-why-jewish-people-do-not-believe-jesus-is-the-messiah/

​


0 Comments

July 27th, 2022

7/27/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
The rabbis and their followers often accuse us, believers in Yeshua the Messiah, of disregarding the Torah while they seemingly live according to its rules.

They claim that the New Testament (NT) is a “poor imitation”, that rabbinical tradition is the original, and that whoever dares to read the NT will immediately stumble over quotations from the Hebrew scriptures (OT).
It’s true that despite its small size (27 books containing 260 chapters) the NT contains almost 1000 quotes from the OT. Frankly, more than 99% of the times that the NT quotes from external texts, those quotes come from the OT. Just like the prophets taught based on the Torah, the NT teaches based on the OT.

Without the Hebrew scriptures there would be no prophecies about a Messiah.
Without messianic prophecies the very messianism of Yeshua is not valid.
Therefore, the theology of the NT is exactly the theology of the OT. Yeshua and his disciples believed in the holiness of the OT, quoted from it and referred to it.

Yeshua and his disciples regarded the Hebrew scriptures as God’s word: written under the supervision and inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Concerning the connection between the Mosaic covenant and the New Covenant, we made a separate video which can be seen here.

BUT WHAT IF WE TOLD YOU THAT THE TEACHING FAVORED BY THE RABBINIC TRADITION IS NOT THE TORAH OF MOSES.What if we told you that they just use the term “Torah of Moses” but actually they mean something completely different?

First of all, let no one cheat you. Today it is simply impossible to keep the commandments of the Torah given at Sinai.

Because the commandments of the Torah revolve around the temple, the tabernacle, the priesthood, the altar and at the core of it all are the sacrifices that cover sins.

But these have not existed for 2000 years.

Almost all the commandments that Moses gave are closely tied to the service in the temple. Under the Mosaic covenant, the worship of God was carried out in the temple. Trying to live  according to the Mosaic covenant these days without temple, tabernacle, the altar and the sacrifices is like trying to ride a bike without wheels.

Secondly, when the temple was destroyed, 2000 years ago, the rabbis had to invent Judaism anew, so that it would work without the service at the temple and the Holy of Holies.

Though they kept using the terms “Judaism” and “Torah” they changed the definition: no more biblical Judaism based on the Torah, but from then on it was the traditions of the Rabbis.

The temple, the priesthood, the altars, the sacrifices and the tabernacle were replaced by new customs.

Most of Jewish traditions have even been taken from other peoples, among whom our people lived during times of exile: Talismans, the Hamsa (hand-shaped charms), Lag b’Omer, wearing of a kippah / yarmulke, seances, wrapping of tefillin, mezuzahs, lying prostrate on the graves of the famous rabbis, the kashrut laws of separating meat and dairy, magic, Bar Mitzvahs, displaying pictures of famous rabbis, saying mantras and even the tradition of breaking of a wine glass at weddings.

All these beloved traditions are not mentioned once in the Bible. You might wonder now: But wait, doesn’t the Torah mention the tefillin and the mezuzah? Not really. The sages chose one or two  words from a verse taken out of its context and by force gave it a new meaning. 

NOTE THAT THE NT IN HEBREW IS NOT CALLED “THE NEW TORAH” BUT “THE NEW COVENANT”.This term has its root in an OT-prophecy by Jeremiah about the making of a new covenant.

“Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord.” (Jeremiah 31:31-32)

While the NT is the most natural continuation of the OT namely the fulfillment of OT prophecies about the Messiah, historians admit that between the Judaism of the Rabbis, reflected in the Talmud, and the OT there’s hardly any connection.

Consider what Israel’s greatest expert in the Sages’ literature has to say: Professor Avigdor Shinan from Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
A man who wears a Kippah himself:

“Our theology is not the theology of the OT. The tradition that we follow today is not the tradition of the OT, it’s the tradition of the Sages. Shabbat laws, kashrut laws, you name it, it’s not in the Scriptures, not in the OT. In the OT, there is no Synagogue no Kaddish, no Kol Nidre, no Bar Mitzvah, no Tallit. Everything that somebody would define as Jewish and look for its root; it’s not the OT it’s the Sages’ literature. That’s where everything started. Where is Judaism in the OT? Moses was not called a Jew. Abraham, was not called a Jew. David, neither. Only Mordechai, ‘Mordechai the Jew’, and that’s at the end of the OT during the Persian time.” (Prof. A. Shinan)

The famous Jewish orthodox writer Chaim Schimmel writes in his book “The Oral Torah”:

“Jews never lived according to the actual words written in the Torah, but according to the traditions of the rabbis.” (Rabbi Chaim Schimmel)

The great irony here is that while the NT was written by Jews and describes the life of the Jewish Messiah the rabbinic tradition on the other hand – the “Oral Law” is based on a Gentile a descendant of Sisera, that converted: Rabbi Akiva. To debunk the legend of the traditions of the Oral Law, we dedicated a video which can be seen here.

2000 years ago the heroes of faith among Israel were biblical characters like Daniel, Noah,
Deborah, Joseph, Solomon, and many more. However, today these have been replaced with characters like Rabbi Schneerson, Rabbi Akiva, Rabban Gamaliel, Rabbi Eliezer, Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi Rabbi Amnon Yitzhak, Rabbi Pinto, Rabbi Eliezer Berland and so on.

FOR THOSE WHO INSIST THAT THEY STILL KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS OF THE MOSAIC COVENANT, HERE’S A LITTLE QUESTIONNAIRE TO EXAMINE YOURSELF.It contains some of the most basic commandments according to which everyone can test if he REALLY keeps the Mosaic covenant.
  • Do you make sure that there is no animal fat in your diet? Like it is written in Leviticus 3:16?
  • Will you stone your kids if they should curse you? As written in Leviticus 20:9?
  • Do you avoid to shave? As written in Leviticus 19:27?
  • Do you take Homosexuals and kill them? As written in Leviticus 20:13?
  • When you buy clothes do you make sure they’re not made out of Shatnez, a mixture of wool and linen? As written in Deuteronomy 22:11?
  • Do you make sure you go up to Jerusalem on the three pilgrimage feasts to bring your offering to the priests? As commanded in Exodus 23:14?
These were just a few examples among hundreds of commandments that are even more complicated. Therefore, the answer to the question, “Why follow an imitation if we have the original?” is: “We agree!”

The NT is the natural continuation of the OT namely the fulfillment of OT prophecies and the descriptions of the Messiah’s life.

But it is the Talmud that abandoned and left the law of Israel and made itself a new way.

The Judaism of rabbinic tradition which comes from the Talmud is not Jewish at all. Original Judaism, the first and true one, is the one described in the writings of the OT and the NT. After the destruction of the 2nd Temple Israel was left with two main options from which only onecould be chosen:
Go for the Judaism of the NT based on the Messiah Yeshua to whom the prophecies of the OT pointed, Or the tradition of the Rabbis based on the sect of the Pharisees… the Rabbis.

Even from a chronological point of view the Judaism of the NT preceded the Judaism of the Talmud, since the writings of the NT were completed already by the first century AD while the writings of the rabbinical tradition, the Talmud, was formulated hundreds of years later. Looking at the content of the first writings of both groups reveals the truth even more clearly:

Chronologically, the last book in the OT is Malachi. It closes the OT.

WHICH IS THE BETTER CONTINUATION OF THE OT? THE NT OR THE TALMUD?The book of Malachi is one of the last books in the OT, chronologically speaking. Interestingly enough, Malachi chapters 3 to 4 start with the hope for a Messiah and end with the hope for a Messiah.

“Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and awesome day of the Lord comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and strike the land with a decree of utter destruction.” (Malachi 4:5-6)

The transition from the Hebrew scriptures to the New Testament is a natural and smooth one. Among the writings of the NT it is known that the gospel of Mark was written first. It starts with the following words:

“The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. As it is written in the prophets
‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way, the voice of one crying in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight,’” (Mark 1:1-3)

Now, let’s look at the opening words of the sages’ writings: The Mishna starts with the Berakhot, the blessings. It says:

“From when may one recite Shema in the evening? From the time when the priests go in to eat their Terumah, until the end of the first watch – so says Rabbi Eliezer. And the Sages say: Until midnight. Rabban Gamliel says: Until the break of dawn.” (Berakhot 1:1)

Judge for yourselves, which of the two writings is the most natural and and logical continuation of the OT? Which of the two gives an appropriate answer to the messianic hope with which the OT ends?

To sum things up: Don’t let them cheat you! No one really keeps the commandments of the Sinaitic covenant. To us and to the Rabbis a new covenant was given. The new covenant that the Rabbis follow is the rabbinical tradition that they made up themselves. The New Covenant that we follow is grounded in God’s Messiah.
​
And what about you?

Which covenant do you follow?

​

0 Comments

Israel finding their Gospel Truth:)

5/16/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture


​https://youtu.be/cb2o2ebYnQQ
​

watch

​


oneforisrael

​
0 Comments

Oral Law- is it from God?

5/14/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture

​

​In a historic first, Dr Eitan Bar sat down with eminent Jewish scholar, Rabbi Chaim Sheitrit, for a live debate. The subject was on the authority of the “Oral Law”: the extra-biblical instructions of rabbinic Judaism passed down from generation to generation. Rabbinic Judaism holds that the Oral Law is divinely authoritative and was given to Moses at Sinai. Dr. Bar naturally refuted those claims, with evidence that it was from a much later date and devised by men, not God.  Held in a neutral space in Tel Aviv, their head-to-head went out live and unedited. Eitan said that it was a defining moment of his life – something he’d been preparing for over many years that had finally come to pass, and that he really enjoyed it.  “Messianic Jews really impress me… I think at the end of this semester I’m going to order that book and read it.”
(Comment on YouTube)

CLICK HERE, TO HELP US REACH ISRAEL WITH THE GOSPEL There have been several such events in English, but it has been very difficult to find a rabbi who was willing to sit and debate matters of faith in Israel – up till now. We want to express our sincere appreciation to the rabbi for his coming and participating. Rabbi Sheitrit is a “rosh kollel”, the head of the Jewish equivalent of a seminary for advanced study of the Talmud. The atmosphere was cordial and Eitan and Chaim parted as friends, but the debate itself was heated at times. Rabbi Sheitrit chose to make his case first, presenting for about 20 minutes his claims to the authority of the Oral Law, then Eitan laid out his reasons for believing it was not divine or authoritative at all. Then each were to respond to the claims of their opponent for some 15 minutes, followed by a short closing statement (about 7 minutes) from each participant.

Want to read more on this subject? Get the book: “Rabbinic Judaism Debunked: Debunking the myth of Rabbinic Oral Law” Rabbi Sheitrit made a case of why he felt the Oral Law was important to Judaism, but offered no real evidence that it was given to Moses at Sinai by God. Eitan gave many reasons to doubt that it hadn’t been, which came from his recently released book on the subject. He included the contradictions with science, the mythological aspects (mermaids feature, for example) and the parts which contradict the character of God by demeaning women and other races.  During the response time, Rabbi Sheitrit defended rabbinic attitudes towards women, making clear that he treated his own wife and family with love and honor, and continued to assert the importance of the Oral Law in Jewish history, but he did not really give any rebuttals to Eitan’s assertions. In fact, someone who had accompanied him expressed disappointment that he hadn’t interacted more with Eitan’s points. The rabbi felt frustrated about the lack of time but the parameters of the debate had been agreed upon from the outset. 

At the end of the debate, one of the staff who had come with Rabbi Chaim said, “You’ve given me a lot to think about!”

The full debate with English subtitles is here. https://youtu.be/fj4POLkTqJY 

​We have received a great deal of very positive feedback from all quarters. Please pray for many more to watch it and be impacted!
“Eitan’s arguments were difficult to refute but on the other hand the rabbi did not present a significant argument that it’s possible to believe in the Oral Torah. I personally studied in a yeshiva and studied Gemara, but thanks to them I came to the conclusion that there is no such thing as the Oral Torah… I’m happy that I found you and hope you upload more content of this kind  – it helps everyone very much! Wish good luck and thanks for the video.” “An interesting discussion, first of all for the fact that there was a dignified and respectful discourse which is amazing these days!” “Thank you very much Eitan, for removing any doubt I had. And Rabbi Chaim, in my opinion, you went round and round and you made me dizzy.” “It was just amazing! I really appreciated the efforts of both sides.”

0 Comments

DID GOD REALLY GIVE AN "ORAL LAW" AT SINAI?

5/12/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
There COMES a DAY in -God's Revelation to humanity-   In Divine Truth, when standing on Truth is non-negotiable. In times of global chaos, confusion, deception, and human suffering, the attainment of 'ultimate truth' in the 'created order' supersedes the chance of offending one's human perception for the ultimate Good of Humanity. Human Perception, if not fully predicated on ultimate truth, leads to disarray and needs Truth to realign with the 'created order that humanity dwells among.' During this specific time in God's design and PLAN, there's only -one way- to cure the immense human suffering in our world today.  Feelings and preconceived, even long held beliefs, need to be willing to consider and learn, giving space on the table for pursuit and attainment of Divine Truth. We are all one humanity, under and in God, and consequences of man made ideologies concerning God is the responsibility of us ALL.



​A House Divided....

(Matthew 12:22–30; Luke 11:14–23)

20Then Jesus went home,f and once again a crowd gathered, so that He and His disciples could not even eat.21When His family heard about this, they went out to take custody of Him, saying, “He is out of His mind.”
22And the scribes who had come down from Jerusalem were saying, “He is possessed by Beelzebul,g” and, “By the prince of the demons He drives out demons.”

23So Jesus called them together and began to speak to them in parables: “How can Satan drive out Satan? 24If a kingdom is divided against itself, it cannot stand. 25If a house is divided against itself, it cannot stand. 26And if Satan is divided and rises against himself, he cannot stand; his end has come. 27Indeed, no one can enter a strong man’s house to steal his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man. Then he can plunder his house.
​
​

The Unpardonable Sin
(Matthew 12:31–32)
28Truly I tell you, the sons of men will be forgiven all sins and blasphemies, as many as they utter. 29But whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will never be forgiven; he is guilty of eternal sin.”
30Jesus made this statement because they were saying, “He has an unclean spirit.”


Jesus’ Mother and Brothers
(Matthew 12:46–50; Luke 8:19–21)
​

31Then Jesus’ mother and brothers came and stood outside. They sent someone in to summon Him, 32and a crowd was sitting around Him. “Look,” He was told, “Your mother and brothersh are outside, asking for You.”
33But Jesus replied, “Who are My mother and My brothers?” 34Looking at those seated in a circle around Him, He said, “Here are My mother and My brothers! 35For whoever does the will of God is My brother and sister and mother.”


​
--------------------------------------
Have you ever wondered whether the rabbinic Jewish religion known to us all today is the same Judaism which was practiced in biblical times, in the time of Moses and the prophets?

Want to read more on this subject? Get the book: “Rabbinic Judaism Debunked: Debunking the myth of Rabbinic Oral Law”For the past 2000 years, the common term “Torah observant”, regarding the Torah or the commandments, hasn’t really meant what most people think it means. Nowadays, it is simply impossible to keep the commandments of the Torah, as they revolve around the Temple, the Tabernacle, the priesthood, the altar and the heart of it all: Sacrificing offerings to atone for our sins. This has all ceased to exist since the destruction of the Temple, 2000 years ago. Today, the expression “Torah observant”, represents people who follow rabbinic rules. There is almost no connection to Moses and his original commandments anymore.

Truth be told, the rabbis have played the most sophisticated scheme on the nation of Israel: They made us all think that rabbinic rules and traditions, which were invented by them, are in fact “the Law of Moses”. In the next few minutes, we are going to prove to you that the Law of Moses and the rabbinic law have nothing to do with one another and that the “Oral Law” was never given by God on Mount Sinai, but that it is nothing more than urban legend.

WHAT HAPPENED? During Biblical times, a week before Yom Kippur, the High Priest would leave his home and go to a quiet place, where he could prepare himself on a spiritual level. Come Yom Kippur, the High Priest would not sleep. He would enter the holy of holies for the one and only time of the year, and sacrifice an offering. Firstly, he would have to make an offering for himself, and then a goat to atone for the sins of the nation. The people of Israel would fast in solidarity. Fasting was a marginal, symbolic gesture, and not meant to atone for the nation’s sins of the entire year. The sacrificial blood on the altar was what atoned for the sins of the nation of Israel. Fasting was Israel’s way of expressing their deep, true and heartfelt remorse, relying on the sacrificial offering. According to tradition, when Yom Kippur came to an end, the nation awaited the “official seal”: An official approval from God that He had accepted the sacrifice and that the nation’s sins have been absolved. What was that approval? A red rope hanging in the Temple. A scarlet thread turned white. That was how the High Priest and the entire nation knew that God had accepted their Yom Kippur sacrifice. The people would dance, celebrate and be joyful. Their sins had been wiped out and absolved for another year.

In the Gemara, the Sages (Hazal) describe the following:

Roughly 40 years prior to the destruction of the Temple, which was destroyed in the year 70 AD, that same red rope, the scarlet thread, stopped turning white. This caused the nation’s leaders great concern. As of the year 30 AD, God stopped giving His approval on Yom Kippur. The scarlet thread no longer turned white. God was no longer willing to accept the Yom Kippur sacrifice. As of the year 30 AD, God stopped dwelling in the Temple, which, 40 years later, was also destroyed.

Do you remember what happened around the year 30 AD?

From then on, the rabbis had to reinvent Judaism in a way that would work even without God’s approval.

Although they kept the terms “Judaism” and “Torah”, the essence had changed. It was no longer the Torah written by Moses. Instead, from now on, it was “Oral Law”. Suddenly, there was no longer a need for the altar, the Temple and offerings for atonement and absolution. Nowadays, donating money to a Yeshiva and skipping two meals a year is enough.

CHANGE IN AUTHORITY.  Let us go back to the time of the Second Temple. At that time, Judaism had several streams or sects, the most dominant of which were the Pharisees. The Pharisee sect grew throughout the years, and pushed the other groups (like the Saduccees and the Essenes, for example) aside. Today, we all know that sect by the name “Rabbinic Judaism”.

Upon the destruction of the Second Temple, the Pharisee sect became Rabbinic Judaism and was no longer based on a divine celestial revelation as it was in the time of Moses, the Fathers, the kings and the prophets. The new leaders of the Jewish world at the time intentionally chose to break away from the Bible. Some of you may find that surprising, but that is what the Talmud itself describes.

One famous and defining story in the Talmud demonstrates how the authority of the rabbis overshadowed the authority of God in their estimation, and to all intents and purposes, stripped God of his sovereignty, making them the new Gods. The story describes the famous debate between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua, regarding an oven, or furnace for cooking.

The Oven of Akhnai 

The debate arose from a question asked by a man who owned a clay furnace (oven). He enlarged it by breaking it in pieces and then reassembling it, using sand, to create a bigger oven. The debate brought before the Sanhedrin was whether the new oven was Kosher or impure. The Talmud specifies that Rabbi Eliezer had brought forward “every imaginable argument” and proved that the oven was in fact Kosher. But the vast majority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin would not accept his arguments and claimed that the oven was NOT Kosher. Rabbi Eliezer went on to prove his claim using supernatural signs: A carob tree miraculously uprooted itself and replanted itself on the other side of the court. A channel of water flowed uphill. But the climax of the story was when Rabbi Eliezer called out: “If the Halachah agrees with me, let it be proved from heaven.” And then, God spoke from the heavens and said: “Why do you dispute with Rabbi Eliezer, with whom the Halachah always agrees?” Meaning, God called out from the sky, saying that Rabbi Eliezer was right. Then, Rabbi Yehoshua stood and made one of the most significant claims in the Talmud and in the Jewish world: “The Torah is not in heaven!”
God no longer holds the reins.

Now, the mandate belongs to the rabbis alone.

THEY have all power and control.

God is left outside.

The Talmud goes on to say that, after the debate, God smiled in agreement and said: “My children have defeated Me, My children have defeated Me.” Meaning, according to the rabbinic legend, God submitted to the authority of the rabbis and therefore, even He admitted that their rulings not only surpassed the authority of Moses, but the authority of God Himself.
From then on, God stopped revealing Himself to the people of Israel, as He did in biblical times. From that moment on, the rabbis’ judgment and rulings are the new Torah, which they call the “Oral Law”.

THE LIE OF THE ORAL LAW.   For the past 2000 years, Judaism has not been based on scripture, but rather on traditions and rules invented by rabbis. In order to try and convince the people, the rabbis taught that on Mount Sinai, Moses was given two different Torahs: the written Torah (or Law), and what they call the “Oral Law”.

While still under the Sinai Covenant, serving God was about the blood of offerings on the altar at the Temple. After the destruction of the Second Temple, there was no more Temple, altar or offerings, nor was there any functioning priesthood. Hazal, the Jewish leaders, found themselves in a pickle. They had to come up with a new way to keep Judaism without its heart. Desperate to find one, they declared themselves and their traditions as the new way to serve God. Thus, 2000 years ago, a new religion was created: the religion of Rabbinic Law, which was based on a new notion: “Derash” (digging for the deeper meaning of the text), which was created by Rabbi Akivah. Rabbi Akivah wasn’t even Jewish, but was a gentile descendant of Sisera, and it was ultimately he who caused the exile which fell upon the Jewish people after he declared that Bar Kochba was the messiah. Bar Kochba turned out to be a false messiah, and led the people into a failed revolt, where hundreds of thousands of Jews were burned alive and the survivors were exiled from their land.

The rabbinic Halacha that developed granted the rabbis authority and control over every religious and social aspect in the nation of Israel, under the claim that this tradition wasn’t invented by them, but passed down to them by word of mouth all the way from Moses on Mount Sinai.

However, this is where the problems begin with the legend of the Oral Law, seeing as throughout the entire Torah, Moses himself could not answer Halachic questions. In each of these cases, Moses referred the questions to God and awaited His reply. This means that Moses didn’t have an Oral Law to refer to, that could interpret the written law for him. (Examples of this can be found in Numbers 9, Leviticus 24, Numbers 15 and 27 and other places). Furthermore, the Torah itself unequivocally shows us that God’s covenant with Israel on Mount Sinai was based on a written Torah alone.

“Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘WRITE these words, for according to the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.’ ” [Exodus 34:27]

There is no mention of additional Torah, or of any traditions that were to be passed down from one generation to the next. So what did Hazal do? They jammed their Oral Law right into the verse. How? They came up with a Derash, according to which the meaning of the words “according to” in the verse: “according to the tenor of these words”, is “on the mouth”, meaning “Oral Law”. This homiletic comes from a purposely distorted interpretation of a common Hebrew expression. However, in Biblical Hebrew, just like in modern Hebrew, the meaning of the words “according to” is not “on the mouth”, but “as”, or “in accordance with”. See, for example, Genesis chapter 43, verse 7: “according to these words.” Numbers 26 verse 56: “According to the lot”, or Deuteronomy 17 verse 10: “according to the sentence”.

HOW DID WE FALL FOR THIS?  Some of you are probably laughing and wondering: How could so many people have fallen for this? But you must remember that the Bible wasn’t available to the common people back then, who couldn’t exactly read or write on their own, but were subject to the interpretation of the rabbinic authority. Another method by which the rabbis tried to force the idea of the Oral Law on the people was by taking a single word in Leviticus 26:46 out of its context:

“These are the statutes and judgments and LAWS which the Lord made between Himself and the children of Israel on Mount Sinai by the hand of Moses.”

“Laws”, according to the rabbis, refers to a written law and an oral law. The problem is that this interpretation overlooks the obvious context, seeing as the book of Leviticus itself explains what these “laws” are: The Law of the Burnt Offering, the Law of the Meat Offering, the Law of the Sin Offering, the Law of the Trespass Offering, the Law of the Sacrifice of Peace Offerings, the Law of the Plague of Leprosy and more. Those are the “laws”. A Torah which is an oral tradition is not mentioned anywhere and it’s clear in the context that Moses is not talking about anything of the sort.

There is another famous section which was taken out of context in order to establish their authority, power and control of the common people. They base this, first and foremost, on seven words of the ‘Shoftim’ portion in the book of Deuteronomy: “according to all that they inform thee” [Deuteronomy 17:10]. So, what is Moses really talking about in this portion of Deuteronomy? The people of Israel had just left Egypt and become a true nation. And just like with any new country, there is a need for law enforcement, such as police officers and judges, to create order and protect the population, apprehend criminals and prosecute the accused. Things that Israel had yet to have at the time. Therefore, in this potion, Moses appoints officers, judges and guards among the people:

“Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment…And it shall be, when the OFFICERS have made an end of speaking unto the people that they shall make CAPTAINS of the armies to lead the people. “…And thou shalt come unto the PRIESTS the LEVITES, and unto the JUDGE that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they shall shew thee the sentence of judgment: And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:” [Deuteronomy 16, 17, 20] 

Moses explains to the people of Israel: Do you have a dispute with someone who has stolen your donkey? Or who has battered your daughter? You have someone to turn to: Go to the officers, the priests and the judges who reside in the court house. This has nothing to do with rabbis or them having the spiritual authority to tell us how to live. As you can see, the term “rabbis” isn’t even mentioned in this section.

And if that’s not enough, in the Sanhedrin Tractate, Hazal took the section in Exodus 23 verse 2, which says:

“Thou shalt NOT follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many.” 

Seemingly simple and clear: do NOT follow the majority in order to distort a judgment for evil. What did Hazal do? The pulled out the 3 words “follow a multitude”, while ignoring the word “NOT”, which appears before them, and claimed that, as long as there is a majority of rabbis, they may provide an interpretation or a ruling on any matter, as they see fit. And the people of Israel must follow them blindly and that, once they have provided a ruling, it is to be indisputably received. In this case as well, you don’t have to be a genius to see how they deliberately distorted the text in order to establish their power and control. Even Rabbi Joseph Zvi Hertz, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, admitted it when he wrote about this section: “The rabbis have chosen to overlook the literal sense in the last three words”.

IS THERE ANY VALUE IN THE TALMUD THEN?Look, without a doubt, the Talmud is an impressive collection of our Jewish culture. Often times, pearls of wisdom can be found within it. But it is crucial to understand that the Talmud and the Old Testament contradict each other hundreds of times in an unequivocal and even embarrassing way, which cannot be resolved. These contradictions prove that the spirit of God could not have inspired the writing of the Talmud. After all, a perfect God couldn’t possibly have made mistakes such as these. But regardless, there is no basis, neither historical nor Biblical, to prove that an Oral Law was given to Moses on Mount Sinai. In fact, a historical and theological examination proves that the opposite is correct. After all, if the “Oral Law” was in fact given to Moses on Mount Sinai, the reader could expect to see thousands of mentions of it throughout the scripture. However, God never mentions it. Moses never used the term “Oral Law” either. Even Joshua Ben Nun, who was appointed by God as Moses’ successor, provides no indication of an oral Halacha. God tells Joshua to meditate in the Torah:

“That you may observe to do according to all that is WRITTEN in it. 
For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success.” [Joshua 1:8]

Ezra the Scribe, who reintroduced the Torah to our people 2500 years ago, never wrote a single word about any Oral Law. Not a single one of Israel’s prophets of kings ever referred to an oral Halacha; No one ever talked about it, mentioned it, or even hinted to its existence. Truth be told, there is not a single verse in the entire Bible wherein the term “Oral Law” is mentioned.

There is also not one single example in the entire Bible of anyone being scolded, punished or accused of breaking any “Oral Law”. The bottom line is that, based on what is written in the Bible, no Oral Law has ever been given. In fact, historians admit that the term “Oral Law” made its first appearance only 1500 years after Moses’ time. We are dealing with the longest, most thorough brainwash in history.

SO HOW DO WE KNOW HOW A SUKKAH IS TO BE BUILT, WITHOUT AN ORAL LAW?According to the rules of literary writing, authors choose to focus on what they find important and to exclude the details they find trivial. Therefore, it would seem that the angle, size and direction of the sukkah weren’t that important to God. Thus, He didn’t want us to focus on trivialities, but on the important issues. Focusing on details which don’t appear in the text means missing the author’s heart. To put it simply: When God demanded that we sit in the sukkah during Sukkot, He probably didn’t really care what size or shape it is. That wasn’t important to Him.

Picture a young man, 3000 years ago, who works all week and, on the weekend, rather than resting and spending time with his family on the Sabbath, he goes to the forest, cuts down trees, carries the wood back to camp, chops it in pieces, a large fire and toils to light it. That is physical, tiring and difficult labor which takes hours on end. Now, imagine that the village chief asks the man to stop and no longer work on the Sabbath. Imagine that the man, rather than understanding that the chief is merely concerned about his emotional, physical and spiritual rest with his family, suddenly started inventing various prohibitions. He prohibits himself and his family for generations to come, to tear toilet paper during the Sabbath, to separate yogurt cups during the Sabbath, to turn on the air conditioner during the Sabbath, to drive over to visit his grandmother during the Sabbath, to barbeque during the Sabbath, to switch on the light in his room during the Sabbath, and thousands of additional rules, claiming that he is abiding by an “Oral Law” instructed by the village chief. A law, without which, it would be impossible to understand what the chief truly meant when he asked him not to work on the Sabbath. This is the EXACT story of the Oral Law.

The Dead Sea Scrolls and the external Jewish writings, from around the year 200 BC, never even hint at the existence of an Oral Law. The same goes for the Babylonian Scrolls, written in the sixth century BC, which describe the Jews in Babylon and their lifestyle. Not only do they never indicate the existence of an Oral Law, but actually contradict the very notion. According to Dr. Finkel, the Jewish identity of the Babylonian exiles was internal only. There was no external indication of religion whatsoever. They had no trace of any symbols of oral traditions reflected on the outside. Like them, many of the Jews of Ethiopia, who returned to Israel after thousands of years in exile, weren’t familiar with, and hadn’t even heard of, the rabbinic traditions and the concept of an “Oral Law” was entirely foreign to them. You see, if there is no actual Oral Law, there is no need for Rabbinic Halacha. If there is no need for Rabbinic Halacha, then there is no need for rabbis. And when there is no need for rabbis, there are suddenly thousands of people left without their power, without their authority, and without their paychecks. An entire industry, to which we all inject billions of shekels, would be nullified.

We would like to note that ancient traditions among the nation are periodically mentioned in the Bible, but always in a negative light.

For example, see the following, written by the prophet Isaiah:
“Therefore the Lord said: ‘Inasmuch as these people 
draw near with their mouths and honor Me with their lips,
But have removed their hearts far from Me, 
And their fear toward Me is taught by the commandment of men, 
Therefore, behold, I will again do a marvelous work among this people, 
A marvelous work and a wonder; For the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, 
and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hidden.”
[Isaiah 29:13-14]

To summarize, An educated person to carry out research based on the Bible, history and archeology can’t afford to take the claim the Moses received the Oral Law along with the written Torah seriously. It is a fairytale, a folk myth with the sole purpose of granting anyone named “rabbi” power and control.
Have you ever wondered whether the rabbinic Jewish religion known to us all today is the same Judaism which was practiced in biblical times, in the time of Moses and the prophets?

Want to read more on this subject? Get the book: “Rabbinic Judaism Debunked: Debunking the myth of Rabbinic Oral Law”For the past 2000 years, the common term “Torah observant”, regarding the Torah or the commandments, hasn’t really meant what most people think it means. Nowadays, it is simply impossible to keep the commandments of the Torah, as they revolve around the Temple, the Tabernacle, the priesthood, the altar and the heart of it all: Sacrificing offerings to atone for our sins. This has all ceased to exist since the destruction of the Temple, 2000 years ago. Today, the expression “Torah observant”, represents people who follow rabbinic rules. There is almost no connection to Moses and his original commandments anymore.

Truth be told, the rabbis have played the most sophisticated scheme on the nation of Israel: They made us all think that rabbinic rules and traditions, which were invented by them, are in fact “the Law of Moses”. In the next few minutes, we are going to prove to you that the Law of Moses and the rabbinic law have nothing to do with one another and that the “Oral Law” was never given by God on Mount Sinai, but that it is nothing more than urban legend.

WHAT HAPPENED?During Biblical times, a week before Yom Kippur, the High Priest would leave his home and go to a quiet place, where he could prepare himself on a spiritual level. Come Yom Kippur, the High Priest would not sleep. He would enter the holy of holies for the one and only time of the year, and sacrifice an offering. Firstly, he would have to make an offering for himself, and then a goat to atone for the sins of the nation. The people of Israel would fast in solidarity. Fasting was a marginal, symbolic gesture, and not meant to atone for the nation’s sins of the entire year. The sacrificial blood on the altar was what atoned for the sins of the nation of Israel. Fasting was Israel’s way of expressing their deep, true and heartfelt remorse, relying on the sacrificial offering. According to tradition, when Yom Kippur came to an end, the nation awaited the “official seal”: An official approval from God that He had accepted the sacrifice and that the nation’s sins have been absolved. What was that approval? A red rope hanging in the Temple. A scarlet thread turned white. That was how the High Priest and the entire nation knew that God had accepted their Yom Kippur sacrifice. The people would dance, celebrate and be joyful. Their sins had been wiped out and absolved for another year. In the Gemara, the Sages (Hazal) describe the following:
​
Roughly 40 years prior to the destruction of the Temple, which was destroyed in the year 70 AD, that same red rope, the scarlet thread, stopped turning white. This caused the nation’s leaders great concern. As of the year 30 AD, God stopped giving His approval on Yom Kippur. The scarlet thread no longer turned white. God was no longer willing to accept the Yom Kippur sacrifice. As of the year 30 AD, God stopped dwelling in the Temple, which, 40 years later, was also destroyed.

Do you remember what happened around the year 30 AD?

From then on, the rabbis had to reinvent Judaism in a way that would work even without God’s approval.

Although they kept the terms “Judaism” and “Torah”, the essence had changed. It was no longer the Torah written by Moses. Instead, from now on, it was “Oral Law”. Suddenly, there was no longer a need for the altar, the Temple and offerings for atonement and absolution. Nowadays, donating money to a Yeshiva and skipping two meals a year is enough.

CHANGE IN AUTHORITY. Let us go back to the time of the Second Temple. At that time, Judaism had several streams or sects, the most dominant of which were the Pharisees. The Pharisee sect grew throughout the years, and pushed the other groups (like the Saduccees and the Essenes, for example) aside. Today, we all know that sect by the name “Rabbinic Judaism”.

Upon the destruction of the Second Temple, the Pharisee sect became Rabbinic Judaism and was no longer based on a divine celestial revelation as it was in the time of Moses, the Fathers, the kings and the prophets. The new leaders of the Jewish world at the time intentionally chose to break away from the Bible. Some of you may find that surprising, but that is what the Talmud itself describes.

One famous and defining story in the Talmud demonstrates how the authority of the rabbis overshadowed the authority of God in their estimation, and to all intents and purposes, stripped God of his sovereignty, making them the new Gods. The story describes the famous debate between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua, regarding an oven, or furnace for cooking.

The Oven of Akhnai 
The debate arose from a question asked by a man who owned a clay furnace (oven). He enlarged it by breaking it in pieces and then reassembling it, using sand, to create a bigger oven. The debate brought before the Sanhedrin was whether the new oven was Kosher or impure. The Talmud specifies that Rabbi Eliezer had brought forward “every imaginable argument” and proved that the oven was in fact Kosher. But the vast majority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin would not accept his arguments and claimed that the oven was NOT Kosher. Rabbi Eliezer went on to prove his claim using supernatural signs: A carob tree miraculously uprooted itself and replanted itself on the other side of the court. A channel of water flowed uphill. But the climax of the story was when Rabbi Eliezer called out: “If the Halachah agrees with me, let it be proved from heaven.” And then, God spoke from the heavens and said: “Why do you dispute with Rabbi Eliezer, with whom the Halachah always agrees?” Meaning, God called out from the sky, saying that Rabbi Eliezer was right. Then, Rabbi Yehoshua stood and made one of the most significant claims in the Talmud and in the Jewish world: “The Torah is not in heaven!”
God no longer holds the reins.

Now, the mandate belongs to the rabbis alone.
THEY have all power and control.
God is left outside.

The Talmud goes on to say that, after the debate, God smiled in agreement and said: “My children have defeated Me, My children have defeated Me.” Meaning, according to the rabbinic legend, God submitted to the authority of the rabbis and therefore, even He admitted that their rulings not only surpassed the authority of Moses, but the authority of God Himself.
From then on, God stopped revealing Himself to the people of Israel, as He did in biblical times. From that moment on, the rabbis’ judgment and rulings are the new Torah, which they call the “Oral Law”.

THE LIE OF THE ORAL LAWFor the past 2000 years, Judaism has not been based on scripture, but rather on traditions and rules invented by rabbis. In order to try and convince the people, the rabbis taught that on Mount Sinai, Moses was given two different Torahs: the written Torah (or Law), and what they call the “Oral Law”.

While still under the Sinai Covenant, serving God was about the blood of offerings on the altar at the Temple. After the destruction of the Second Temple, there was no more Temple, altar or offerings, nor was there any functioning priesthood. Hazal, the Jewish leaders, found themselves in a pickle. They had to come up with a new way to keep Judaism without its heart. Desperate to find one, they declared themselves and their traditions as the new way to serve God. Thus, 2000 years ago, a new religion was created: the religion of Rabbinic Law, which was based on a new notion: “Derash” (digging for the deeper meaning of the text), which was created by Rabbi Akivah. Rabbi Akivah wasn’t even Jewish, but was a gentile descendant of Sisera, and it was ultimately he who caused the exile which fell upon the Jewish people after he declared that Bar Kochba was the messiah. Bar Kochba turned out to be a false messiah, and led the people into a failed revolt, where hundreds of thousands of Jews were burned alive and the survivors were exiled from their land.

The rabbinic Halacha that developed granted the rabbis authority and control over every religious and social aspect in the nation of Israel, under the claim that this tradition wasn’t invented by them, but passed down to them by word of mouth all the way from Moses on Mount Sinai.

However, this is where the problems begin with the legend of the Oral Law, seeing as throughout the entire Torah, Moses himself could not answer Halachic questions. In each of these cases, Moses referred the questions to God and awaited His reply. This means that Moses didn’t have an Oral Law to refer to, that could interpret the written law for him. (Examples of this can be found in Numbers 9, Leviticus 24, Numbers 15 and 27 and other places). Furthermore, the Torah itself unequivocally shows us that God’s covenant with Israel on Mount Sinai was based on a written Torah alone.

“Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘WRITE these words, for according to the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.’ ” [Exodus 34:27]

There is no mention of additional Torah, or of any traditions that were to be passed down from one generation to the next. So what did Hazal do? They jammed their Oral Law right into the verse. How? They came up with a Derash, according to which the meaning of the words “according to” in the verse: “according to the tenor of these words”, is “on the mouth”, meaning “Oral Law”. This homiletic comes from a purposely distorted interpretation of a common Hebrew expression. However, in Biblical Hebrew, just like in modern Hebrew, the meaning of the words “according to” is not “on the mouth”, but “as”, or “in accordance with”. See, for example, Genesis chapter 43, verse 7: “according to these words.” Numbers 26 verse 56: “According to the lot”, or Deuteronomy 17 verse 10: “according to the sentence”.

HOW DID WE FALL FOR THIS?Some of you are probably laughing and wondering: How could so many people have fallen for this? But you must remember that the Bible wasn’t available to the common people back then, who couldn’t exactly read or write on their own, but were subject to the interpretation of the rabbinic authority. Another method by which the rabbis tried to force the idea of the Oral Law on the people was by taking a single word in Leviticus 26:46 out of its context:

“These are the statutes and judgments and LAWS which the Lord made between Himself and the children of Israel on Mount Sinai by the hand of Moses.”

“Laws”, according to the rabbis, refers to a written law and an oral law. The problem is that this interpretation overlooks the obvious context, seeing as the book of Leviticus itself explains what these “laws” are: The Law of the Burnt Offering, the Law of the Meat Offering, the Law of the Sin Offering, the Law of the Trespass Offering, the Law of the Sacrifice of Peace Offerings, the Law of the Plague of Leprosy and more. Those are the “laws”. A Torah which is an oral tradition is not mentioned anywhere and it’s clear in the context that Moses is not talking about anything of the sort.

There is another famous section which was taken out of context in order to establish their authority, power and control of the common people. They base this, first and foremost, on seven words of the ‘Shoftim’ portion in the book of Deuteronomy: “according to all that they inform thee” [Deuteronomy 17:10]. So, what is Moses really talking about in this portion of Deuteronomy? The people of Israel had just left Egypt and become a true nation. And just like with any new country, there is a need for law enforcement, such as police officers and judges, to create order and protect the population, apprehend criminals and prosecute the accused. Things that Israel had yet to have at the time. Therefore, in this potion, Moses appoints officers, judges and guards among the people:

“Judges and officers shalt thou make thee in all thy gates, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, throughout thy tribes: and they shall judge the people with just judgment…And it shall be, when the OFFICERS have made an end of speaking unto the people that they shall make CAPTAINS of the armies to lead the people. “…And thou shalt come unto the PRIESTS the LEVITES, and unto the JUDGE that shall be in those days, and enquire; and they shall shew thee the sentence of judgment: And thou shalt do according to the sentence, which they of that place which the Lord shall choose and thou shalt observe to do according to all that they inform thee:” [Deuteronomy 16, 17, 20] 
Moses explains to the people of Israel: Do you have a dispute with someone who has stolen your donkey? Or who has battered your daughter? You have someone to turn to: Go to the officers, the priests and the judges who reside in the court house. This has nothing to do with rabbis or them having the spiritual authority to tell us how to live. As you can see, the term “rabbis” isn’t even mentioned in this section.

And if that’s not enough, in the Sanhedrin Tractate, Hazal took the section in Exodus 23 verse 2, which says:

“Thou shalt NOT follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many.” 

Seemingly simple and clear: do NOT follow the majority in order to distort a judgment for evil. What did Hazal do? The pulled out the 3 words “follow a multitude”, while ignoring the word “NOT”, which appears before them, and claimed that, as long as there is a majority of rabbis, they may provide an interpretation or a ruling on any matter, as they see fit. And the people of Israel must follow them blindly and that, once they have provided a ruling, it is to be indisputably received. In this case as well, you don’t have to be a genius to see how they deliberately distorted the text in order to establish their power and control. Even Rabbi Joseph Zvi Hertz, the Chief Rabbi of the United Kingdom, admitted it when he wrote about this section: “The rabbis have chosen to overlook the literal sense in the last three words”.

IS THERE ANY VALUE IN THE TALMUD THEN?Look, without a doubt, the Talmud is an impressive collection of our Jewish culture. Often times, pearls of wisdom can be found within it. But it is crucial to understand that the Talmud and the Old Testament contradict each other hundreds of times in an unequivocal and even embarrassing way, which cannot be resolved. These contradictions prove that the spirit of God could not have inspired the writing of the Talmud. After all, a perfect God couldn’t possibly have made mistakes such as these. But regardless, there is no basis, neither historical nor Biblical, to prove that an Oral Law was given to Moses on Mount Sinai. In fact, a historical and theological examination proves that the opposite is correct. After all, if the “Oral Law” was in fact given to Moses on Mount Sinai, the reader could expect to see thousands of mentions of it throughout the scripture. However, God never mentions it. Moses never used the term “Oral Law” either. Even Joshua Ben Nun, who was appointed by God as Moses’ successor, provides no indication of an oral Halacha. God tells Joshua to meditate in the Torah:

“That you may observe to do according to all that is WRITTEN in it. 
For then you will make your way prosperous, and then you will have good success.” [Joshua 1:8]

Ezra the Scribe, who reintroduced the Torah to our people 2500 years ago, never wrote a single word about any Oral Law. Not a single one of Israel’s prophets of kings ever referred to an oral Halacha; No one ever talked about it, mentioned it, or even hinted to its existence. Truth be told, there is not a single verse in the entire Bible wherein the term “Oral Law” is mentioned.
There is also not one single example in the entire Bible of anyone being scolded, punished or accused of breaking any “Oral Law”. The bottom line is that, based on what is written in the Bible, no Oral Law has ever been given. In fact, historians admit that the term “Oral Law” made its first appearance only 1500 years after Moses’ time. We are dealing with the longest, most thorough brainwash in history.

SO HOW DO WE KNOW HOW A SUKKAH IS TO BE BUILT, WITHOUT AN ORAL LAW?According to the rules of literary writing, authors choose to focus on what they find important and to exclude the details they find trivial. Therefore, it would seem that the angle, size and direction of the sukkah weren’t that important to God. Thus, He didn’t want us to focus on trivialities, but on the important issues. Focusing on details which don’t appear in the text means missing the author’s heart. To put it simply: When God demanded that we sit in the sukkah during Sukkot, He probably didn’t really care what size or shape it is. That wasn’t important to Him.

Picture a young man, 3000 years ago, who works all week and, on the weekend, rather than resting and spending time with his family on the Sabbath, he goes to the forest, cuts down trees, carries the wood back to camp, chops it in pieces, a large fire and toils to light it. That is physical, tiring and difficult labor which takes hours on end. Now, imagine that the village chief asks the man to stop and no longer work on the Sabbath. Imagine that the man, rather than understanding that the chief is merely concerned about his emotional, physical and spiritual rest with his family, suddenly started inventing various prohibitions. He prohibits himself and his family for generations to come, to tear toilet paper during the Sabbath, to separate yogurt cups during the Sabbath, to turn on the air conditioner during the Sabbath, to drive over to visit his grandmother during the Sabbath, to barbeque during the Sabbath, to switch on the light in his room during the Sabbath, and thousands of additional rules, claiming that he is abiding by an “Oral Law” instructed by the village chief. A law, without which, it would be impossible to understand what the chief truly meant when he asked him not to work on the Sabbath. This is the EXACT story of the Oral Law.

The Dead Sea Scrolls and the external Jewish writings, from around the year 200 BC, never even hint at the existence of an Oral Law. The same goes for the Babylonian Scrolls, written in the sixth century BC, which describe the Jews in Babylon and their lifestyle. Not only do they never indicate the existence of an Oral Law, but actually contradict the very notion. According to Dr. Finkel, the Jewish identity of the Babylonian exiles was internal only. There was no external indication of religion whatsoever. They had no trace of any symbols of oral traditions reflected on the outside. Like them, many of the Jews of Ethiopia, who returned to Israel after thousands of years in exile, weren’t familiar with, and hadn’t even heard of, the rabbinic traditions and the concept of an “Oral Law” was entirely foreign to them. You see, if there is no actual Oral Law, there is no need for Rabbinic Halacha. If there is no need for Rabbinic Halacha, then there is no need for rabbis. And when there is no need for rabbis, there are suddenly thousands of people left without their power, without their authority, and without their paychecks. An entire industry, to which we all inject billions of shekels, would be nullified.
​
We would like to note that ancient traditions among the nation are periodically mentioned in the Bible, but always in a negative light. For example, see the following, written by the prophet Isaiah:
​
“Therefore the Lord said: ‘Inasmuch as these people 
draw near with their mouths and honor Me with their lips,
But have removed their hearts far from Me, 
And their fear toward Me is taught by the commandment of men, 
Therefore, behold, I will again do a marvelous work among this people, 
A marvelous work and a wonder; For the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, 
and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hidden.”
[Isaiah 29:13-14]
​

To summarize, An educated person to carry out research based on the Bible, history and archeology can’t afford to take the claim the Moses received the Oral Law along with the written Torah seriously. It is a fairytale, a folk myth with the sole purpose of granting anyone named “rabbi” power and control.
0 Comments

Who created the Oral Law, and is it God's Word?

4/27/2022

0 Comments

 

In this article, we will reveal what’s wrong in the Rabbis’ claim that, allegedly, the written law of Moses cannot be understood without the rabbinical tradition clarifying it in the Oral Law.  SO DO WE REALLY DEPEND ON THE RABBINICAL TRADITION, “THE ORAL LAW”, IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND THE WRITTEN LAW? This is what the rabbis want us to believe. In that way, we stay dependent on them. This dependency brings them power which also enables them to extort people and make a lot of money. But in the Bible God tells the people of Israel the exact opposite.
​

From the beginning, God made it clear to Israel that his commandments are not complicated, so that in order to understand them we would not depend on a rabbi to explain them to us. “For this commandment that I command you today is not too hard for you, neither is it far off. It is not in heaven that you should say, ‘Who will ascend to heaven for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?’ Neither is it beyond the sea, that you should say, ‘Who will go over the sea for us and bring it to us, that we may hear it and do it?’ But the word is very near you. It is in your mouth and in your heart, so that you can do it.” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14) Therefore, according to the rules of biblical interpretation the biblical commandments are based on the most simple reading of the text.  It is the context of the verses in the Bible itself that clarifies what the original author meant. There is nothing wrong with asking for help if we don’t understand something. But we should not be dependent on one person who allegedly is the only one with the authority to interpret. That’s what the rabbis want us to think. Therefore, the rabbis frequently make use of a logical fallacy that is an appeal to ignorance, an argument from ignorance. A logical mistake in which one tries to get to a conclusion out of lack of knowledge or proof.

For example, let’s say I don’t understand a commandment like, what is an “Orla” (foreskin) and how do I need to cut it? Or, I don’t know what a “Succah” (booth) is, and what color it should be, what angle, or how to build it. Therefore, there has to exist an Oral Law that explains and interprets what I don’t know. See what Rabbi Yossi Mizrachi says: “Listen up, there is a simple point to make here, the day you have an answer to it we’ll continue the discussion. There are 613 written commandments and none of them contains an explanation on how to implement them. Nothing.”  This typical example was taken from a lecture of one of the most famous rabbis today, Rabbi Yossi Mizrahi, given in January 2017 in Ramat Gan.  In this lecture a 17 year old boy challenged Rabbi Mizrahi to prove the existence of an Oral Law, after telling the rabbi that he watched our video, “The Myth of the Oral Law”, a video that proves that the Oral Law was not given to Moses by God at Mount Sinai. 

THE RABBIS DON’T AGREE ABOUT THE MEANING OF BIBLICAL WORDS First of all, it’s important to remember that today, thousands of years after the giving of the Law, it is very likely that we don’t understand every word. Or that we understand something else than the original meaning. But we need to remember that the biblical Hebrew that the people of Israel used is similar but not identical to the Modern Hebrew we speak today. Because there are words, terms, expressions or commandments that we don’t understand it does not mean that the people living at that time did not understand either. For example, in Ezekiel 1 we find the word “Khashmal”. Obviously, the meaning of “Khashmal” at the time of Ezekiel and in the context of the text is not identical to its modern meaning, “electricity”. The word “Khashmal” is a perfect example showing how the sages contradict one another. And therefore, their words cannot be “the Oral Law” passed on by Moses. The rabbis do not agree with one another concerning the meaning of “Khashmal”. Rashi says, that “Khashmal” is the name of an angel. Rabbi Bahya Ben Asher, however, claims that it refers to animals. In Parshanut Metzudat David it is claimed to refer to flames. Then again Abarbanel states that it means “prophecy”. Malbim, saying that “Kashmal” is God’s presence claims furthermore that it is forbidden to accept Abarbanel’s interpretation. 

He says: “‘Khashmal’ – God forbid that we accept Abarbanel’s opinion.”

Pretty confused, this “Oral Law”. 

Now … we want to go over each claim from Yossi Mizrahi’s lecture and take it apart. 

Let’s start. THE EXAMPLE OF CIRCUMCISION “What’s an ‘Orla’? How would you know what a ‘Orla’ is? How did Moses know where to cut? It’s not written how to circumcise. How come they all knew where to cut?” (Rabbi Yossi Mizrahi) Seems like Mizrahi forgot that the command of the circumcision was given to Abraham hundreds of years before the Sinai covenant, which supposedly was when the Oral Law was given together with the written Law. So did Abraham have a rabbi who traveled back in time in order to explain to him how to circumcise?

According to Prof. Nisan Rubin and Prof. Binyamin Mazar the circumcision of the male is not only a Jewish phenomenon. It was a known tradition among the majority of peoples. In fact, in ancient times it was common also in the area of Egypt, Assyria and around the Mediterranean about 3000 years BC. THE EXAMPLE OF TFILIN “Tfilin”, (arm wrapping) continues Rabbi Mizrachi. “How come? How come they all put on black Tfilin all over the world?”  And how come that already for thousands of years, people in Asia make Sushi with green algae? Maybe the Japanese also received an Oral Law with Sushi rules? When a certain tradition exists for thousands of years it does not mean that God ordered it. Actually, the word “Tfilin” is not mentioned in the Bible at all. Rather, the sages took the word “Totaphot” later on and claimed it referred to Tfilin. However, whoever compares the commandment of the “Totaphot”, in Deut. 6:8, with the identical commandment given earlier in Exodus 13:9 will see that the meaning of “Totaphot” is actually “as a memory”. The commandment “as Totaphot between your eyes” does not command us to put a box on our forehead. Rather, it is a commandment to always remember God in your thoughts.  WHAT IS A MEZUZAH, AND WHO THOUGHT OF IT? Rabbi Mizrachi, convinced that mezuzot were an invention of the Oral Law declared,  “The written Law does not tell us what to write in the Mezuzah. Who came up with this?”  But when it comes to the word Mezuzah, just like the Tfilin, it’s again about a verse taken out of its context. The general concept is from Deuteronomy 6:9, but see what is written in Judges 16, verse 3: “…and (he) took hold of the doors [mezuzot] of the gate of the city and the two posts, and pulled them up, bar and all, and put them on his shoulders and carried them to the top of the hill that is in front of Hebron.” (Judges 16:3)  Judging by this verse, would we infer that the inhabitants of Gaza, the Philistines, also kept the commandment of the Mezuzah? Of course not! The meaning of the word “Mezuzah” becomes obvious in the context: the posts surrounding a door. Samson grabbed them when he pulled up the door of the city gate. Hence, the Mezuzah is but another term whose meaning the rabbis have changed, developed into something else, and taken out of context.  THE EXAMPLE OF SUKKOT (FEAST OF TABERNACLES) “What is a ‘fruit of splendid trees’?” Asks Mizrachi. “It’s written that we need 4 of them, 4 kinds.” Mizrahi doesn’t understand how to discern the meaning of “4 kinds”, and in general, how to understand anything connected to Succot, without the explanation provided by the Oral Law. First of all, in Deuteronomy 4 and 13 God warns us not to add anything to the commands written in the Torah.  “You shall not add to the word that I command you.” (Deuteronomy 4:2) Therefore, even if we don’t fully understand the commandments regarding Succot and it doesn’t say exactly how to build the booth we still do not have the authority to add to these commandments traditions, rules and regulations that we can’t find anywhere in the Bible. 

But that’s exactly what the Sages did. And as if that wasn’t enough they even did that in God’s name. And therefore, they need to be called to account for using God’s name in vain. Why didn’t God give clear and detailed guidelines in the Torah for every little thing? For example, how the booths need to be set up, how big, at which angle, color, and so on. Or which kind of splendid trees? Most likely for the same reason why God did not give all the flowers in the world the same shape and color. He does not want everything to be done the same way and look identical. Look around at God’s creation. The colors, shapes and smells show such an amazing variety. God is creative. And he made creative human beings and gave them freedom to create with creativity. So they could express their creativity.

Also in this commandment and others. If he did not let us know in which size or form, angle or direction the booth has to be set up than apparently that’s not what’s important to God. Rather, he left it up to us, to our imagination and creativity. Apparently, he did not want us to be fixed on a certain form, model or structure. Rather, he allowed us to express our creativity and individuality.
All that was important to God is that we’d remember that he brought us out of Egypt. 

Imagine for a second how boring that would be: A city in which everyone wears the exact same thing. All the men wearing black suits, black pants and black hats. And all the women in black dresses and wearing black head coverings. Wait a minute. That’s Bnei Brak in Israel. Oh well, never mind. THE EXAMPLE OF SHABBAT “It’s not written in the Bible how to consecrate the Sabbath. It’s not written in the Bible what ‘work’ is.” “You shall kindle no fire in all your dwelling places on the Sabbath day.” (Exodus 35:3) Pay attention to this, an action was prohibited namely to light a fire. The fire is not the problem but the action of lighting it. Why? The context tells us. One verse earlier it is written: “Six days work shall be done, but on the seventh day you shall have a Sabbath of solemn rest, holy to the Lord. Whoever does any work on it  shall be put to death.” (Exodus 35:2) Did you notice that the word “work” was mentioned twice? Not accidentally. In Egypt, the people of Israel worked non-stop. Now, they are commanded not to work, but to rest one day per week. A day consecrated to God, the family and rest. The lighting of a fire was considered work. Why? Not because God has a problem with fire, but because the lighting of a fire was physically tiring, never ending. Unlike today in biblical times to light a fire involved going to the woods, cutting down trees, bringing the wood back to the camp, cutting it into smaller pieces, building a stack of wood and then trying to set the whole stack on fire. We’re talking about hours of hard physical work that should not be done on a Sabbath. Why? Because you should rest on the Sabbath, relax, spend time with your family and deeply consider God. It’s a rest for the body and the soul.

All the rules that the “Oral Law” added, for example not to break a yogurt cup on the Sabbath, not to rip toilet paper, not to dry off, not to look into the mirror, and other ridiculous, rabbinical rules completely miss God’s purpose and the actual goal.  Mizrahi claims:  “Build it the way I showed you on the mountain, the way I showed you on the mountain – in general I showed you how to build the tabernacle. God showed things to Moses that were not written in the Torah. This is evidence for the Oral Law. It’s written in past tense, when I showed you – when I showed you then.” According to Rabbi Mizrahi the wording “when I showed you” implies an oral transmission. Without noticing Mizrahi chose to use, out of all chapters, one that proves the exact opposite of his claim. Since Moses did write in meticulous detail and in numerous chapters ALL the commandments connected to the tabernacle. See Exodus Chapters 25 to 30, chapters 35 to 40, and you will find that Mizrahi’s claim backfired on him, since Moses actually does clarify, in writing, the way the tabernacle has to be built in all its details.  “What would the sages gain from coming up with thousands of rules?” Glad you asked!

Let’s take for example Succot, feast of booths. Or for the sake of argument, all the other customs. In simple words, their gain is power, control and money. The Rabbis are the only authority and have the right to determine for the people of Israel what a kosher Succah (booth) is and what the four species are. What would the Etrog sellers do without their customers being tied down to the rules of the Rabbis? So it turns out that Religion is a lucrative business. The rabbinical tradition preserves and encourages this business, typical for other religions too, that gets validation from one source only. It functions like a monopoly or a cartel. For example, according to the website “Kipa” the market of the “four species” alone has a turnover of tens of millions in one single week, once a year. Now imagine how many starving people could be fed with the billions of turnover in Yeshivas and and the kosher market, money coming from all of us. In a way it seems we could have already ended poverty in Israel.

So did you understand what’s the agenda of the “Sages” behind the creation of thousands of rules? It gives them power and control over the people. It makes us dependent on them alone and this brings in lots and lots and lots of money. 

TO SUM IT UP: We proved that we do not need the rabbinical tradition to explain the Bible to us, rather, this is about how the Rabbis can gain exclusive control over our lives. And this, obviously, expresses itself in money – lots of it. Lastly, we want to challenge Rabbi Yossi Mizrahi and the Rabbis in general with this question: 

If according to your logic the written law cannot be understood without the rabbinical tradition explaining it to us, how then did Adam and Eve understand the meaning of the commandment  “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” (Genesis 1:28)  Or … the commandment not to eat from the tree of knowledge. “…for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die.” (Genesis 2:17)  Could Adam and Eve check in the Oral Law? Impossible, since according to the Sages the Oral Law was given together with the Torah at Mount Sinai thousands of years after the expulsion out of the Garden of Eden. Maybe Adam and Eve traveled into the future, studied at a rabbinical Yeshiva and traveled back to the past.
 
In another video, we give further reasons why we do not believe that there is an Oral Law given by God at Mount Sinai.
​

0 Comments

The Truth About the Oral Law

4/1/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
- The Truth About the Oral Law –
Dr..Michael Brown takes issue with a recent Israel Today article concerning rabbinic authority


As a Jewish believer in Yeshua who has been involved in dialogue with the rabbinic community for the last 50 years, I found Josh Feinberg’s May 4 article in Israel Today, titled, “Oral Law vs Nice Culture,” both disturbing and surprising.

Feinberg wrote his article in response to a recent debate between Messianic Jew Eitan Bar and ultra-Orthodox Rabbi Chaim Shitrit, noting that the debate was called “‘historic’ by some leaders in the Israeli Messianic community,” a claim that Feinberg dismissed.

What Feinberg seems to have missed is that in many ways this debate was historic, since it was conducted in Israel, in Hebrew, between two Jews, focused totally on the Oral Law. Has this happened before in a public setting? Not to my knowledge.

But it is Feinberg’s arguments on behalf of the Oral Law that were most concerning, since they are the very same arguments I’ve heard from rabbis for decades as to why no Jew should believe in Yeshua.

Feinberg wrote: “But the real wonder is why Messianic Jews are still so preoccupied with an issue settled more than two millennia ago. Jews as a whole long ago rejected the Sadducees’ literal interpretation of the Torah, which among other things lead them to deny resurrection from the dead because, to follow Eitan Bar’s argument, it is not once mentioned in the text.”
Is Feinberg not aware that this is the identical argument we hear when it comes to Yeshua? “The Jewish leaders settled this 2,000 years ago. Jesus is not the Messiah.”

Or, as an ultra-Orthodox rabbi said to me in the early 1970s, “We have an unbroken chain of tradition going straight back to Moses. Who are you to teach me what to believe?”

That’s why this is such a major issue to us as Jews. It’s a matter of authority. It’s a matter of who is following the true interpretation of Scripture. This is hardly a trivial matter.

As an Orthodox Jewish website explains: “In many respects, the Oral Torah is more important than the Written Torah. . . . It is even more dear to God than the Written Torah. The Oral Torah is the means through which we devote our lives to God and His teachings.”

Of course this is an issue to Messianic Jews who look to Yeshua and the New Covenant writings as our final authority. And it was Yeshua who rebuked some of the Jewish leaders of His day, saying, “You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men. . . . You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to establish your tradition!” (Mark 7:8-9)
As for the matter of the Oral Law being “settled more than two millennia ago,” that is hardly accurate, as is evident from ancient Jewish literature dating to the late Second Temple era (such as 4QMMT from Qumran), where there was heated debate between the varied Jewish sects, a debate that was not settled by the universal agreement of the Jewish community but by the destruction of the Second Temple and the eventual triumph of the Pharisees.
Not only so, but it appears clear that in the first 300-400 years of this era, the early Messianic Jews (called “Nazarenes”) continued to live as Jews (to the consternation of the increasingly Gentile church) while at the same time rejecting the emerging rabbinic traditions, along with rabbinic authority.
​
As for the idea that Bar’s rejection of the Oral Law based on it not being found in the Bible parallels the Sadducean rejection of the resurrection because it was not found in the Torah, this too is wrong since:
  1. Yeshua showed them it was found in the Torah; and
  2. They were guilty of rejecting the rest of the Hebrew Scriptures, which clearly contain references to future resurrection.







Feinberg claims that “without Oral Law Jesus’ teaching about resurrection can neither be verified nor justified,” by which he apparently means oral traditions. But we only have those traditions today because they were put in writing, and it is the written Word of God that carries ultimate authority.
As for Feinberg’s claim that “there are Jews today only because their forefathers lived by the Oral Law,” that is a serious overstatement. Rather, there are Jews today only because God graciously chose to preserve us. Whether He used these traditions or not is really beside the point, unless you believe Jews could not have observed the Sabbath over the centuries without knowing every detail of the Talmud’s 39 divisions of labor.

Feinberg makes the mistaken claim that religious groups that only follow the Scriptures cannot exist for long. To the contrary, the Karaites are still here, more than one millennium after being marginalized by the rabbinic community, while, on the Christian side, Protestant Christians recently celebrated more than 500 years of Reformation, rejecting the traditions of the Catholic Church and holding to sola Scriptura.
​
Yet there’s even a caption to a photo in the article which reads, “The Oral Law, now written down as part of the Talmud, is the focus of ultra-Orthodox learning, even more so than the Bible, which irks Messianic Jews.” Well, it should irk Messianic Jews, since:
  1. It takes the focus away from the written Word;
  2. It exalts the rabbinic traditions as sacrosanct and indisputable; and
  3. It presents a very different picture of the Messiah.

​How then does Feinberg justify his embrace of the Oral Law? He points to the common phrase, “the Lord said to Moses, speak to the Israelites,” then claiming, “This means that the covenant between God and Israel, that was made soon after the crossing of the Red Sea, was based entirely on the Torah that Moses spoke to Israel.”

This is patently false, as passages like Exod 24:1-8; Deut 17:18-20; 31:24–29; and Josh 1:8, among others, make perfectly clear. (Please take a moment to read these passages for yourself; for an in-depth study, see volume five of my series, Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus.)

Exodus 34:27 also makes this explicit: “And the LORD said to Moses: Write down these commandments, for in accordance with these commandments I make a covenant with you and with Israel.” 

Yet Feinberg actually quotes this verse, citing a rabbinic interpretation that turns the meaning of the text upside down, as if it supports the Oral Torah rather than the written Torah.

Indeed, the Talmudic interpretation is purely homiletical and completely unsustainable exegetically and grammatically; Feinberg even acknowledges it sounds farfetched. Why on earth cite it, then?

For Feinberg, however, the Torah cannot be observed without the Oral Law. “Without it,”he writes, “the people of Israel can’t be obedient to God. Without the Oral Law, Israel can’t be united as one distinguishable nation.”

But how is it, then, that these same rabbis, the guardians of the nation, can be trusted to tell us how God wants us to build a sukkah, allegedly passing on the exact dimensions that God gave to Moses on Sinai, yet they cannot be trusted to recognize the real Messiah? And how is it that these sages could know every detail of Sabbath observance, including that you can only use a soft brush on your hair on the Sabbath, but they could be so wrong about the Messiah, and for 2,000 years, at that?

In keeping with this, an ultra-Orthodox rabbi pointed out to me that the Oral Law is a living tradition with living rabbinic authorities. If you, as a Messianic Jew, told him you upheld the Oral Law, he would ask you, “First, who is your current, rabbinic authority, the one whose rulings you submit to? Second, you are an idolator and you need to repent.”

In other words, you don’t get to say, “I adhere to rabbinic teaching and the authority of the Oral Law, but not when it comes to the most essential areas of my faith.”

As for Messianic Jews today picking and choosing which customs they may follow, that’s what other Jews do as well, from Reform to Conservative to Modern Orthodox to Haredi. There is nothing unusual here.

Feinberg ends his article with a lengthy quote from Rabbi Ouri Amos Cherki, culminating with these words: “the essence of the covenant God made with Israel is seen through the life shaped in the Beit Midrash, a life of Oral Law.”
Unfortunately, that life is one without Yeshua, one that would spit on the New Covenant writings, one that is an enemy of the gospel (Rom 11:28).
Yet I do not disparage the rabbis of the Talmud nor do I denigrate our traditions. I simply say the obvious: there is not an unbroken chain of tradition going back to Moses on Mt. Sinai.

Where those traditions contradict the letter or the spirit of the Law, or where they misunderstand the person of the Messiah or the nature of redemption, we do well to ignore those traditions and follow what is written. That alone is the path of life.


Dr. Michael L. Brown is a noted Messianic Jewish apologist and the author of more than forty books. His website is AskDrBrown.org.
--
Israel Today reached out to Josh Feinberg and he sent the following reply to Dr. Brown’s essay:
“I am flabbergasted by the sheer audacity of this dogmatic essay, which assumes that all the wisdom of Israel’s sages combined is no match for one luminary who doesn’t even realize that it is the Oral Law that preserved the Hebrew language without which the Hebrew Bible cannot be understood, and the true meaning of the language would be lost.. But he knows the truth and they don’t. Why? Because they have rejected Jesus. Oh, that Dr. Brown would understand that the way he portrays Judaism and Jews is identical to the infamous image of the blindfold Synagogastanding humiliated before the triumphant Ecclesia. Oh, and for heaven’s sake, that Dr. Brown would learn something from Paul, who was not so proud to stand silent in the face of the mystery of Israel.”



0 Comments

Shemittah

1/8/2022

0 Comments

 

​The Shemitah (sometimes spelled Shemittah or Shmita) is the final year in a seven-year cycle of debt forgiveness and land use prescribed for Israel in the Old Testament. The term Shemitah has been popularized lately with the publication of the book The Mystery of the Shemitah by Rabbi Jonathan Cahn. According to Cahn, the Shemitah year culminates in the Day of Remission, Ehul 29.

Every seventh year, the people of Israel were instructed to forgive debts owed by fellow Israelites, refrain from direct cultivation, and permit people and animals to harvest the free-growing crops that remained. The instructions concerning the Shemitah are mentioned in passages such as Exodus 21:2; 23:10–11; Leviticus 25:1–7; Deuteronomy 15:1–6; and 31:10–13.

The purpose of the Shemitah was to allow the land to recover from agriculture, as well as to provide sustenance for the poor. The Shemitah was also meant to break the cycle of perpetual debt and poverty in which many people found themselves trapped (Deuteronomy 15:4, 11). This Sabbath year reflected God’s decision to rest on the seventh day of creation (Genesis 2:1–3). As with many religious concepts, there are different interpretations of the Sabbath year within each of the various sects of Judaism.

Historically, the Shemitah seems to have been all but ignored by Judaism, even in the days of the Old Testament. Today, the only aspect of the Sabbath year that seems to be upheld is a prohibition on certain kinds of food exports for crops actually grown within the boundaries of Israel during the seventh year of the cycle. Modern reasons for rejecting this law involve claims that agricultural laws only apply within the boundaries of Israel and that they are generally no longer in effect, thereby cancelling the associated laws on debt forgiveness.

Even for those inclined to consider the Shemitah binding, Talmudic scholars developed a mechanism known as a pruzbul to effectively negate the loan-forgiveness aspects of Shemitah. This process hinges on the scriptural command to forgive the debts of a “friend or brother” (Deuteronomy 15:2), which Talmudic scholars chose to interpret as implying that only private debts are cancelled. Making a pruzbultransfers the debt to a public religious court, a beit din, so the debt is theoretically no longer between friends, brothers, or neighbors. According to this interpretation, the once-private debt is fully recoverable, and nothing is forgiven (see Mark 7:8–9).

Likewise, those interested in maintaining farms during a Shemitah Sabbath year have turned to a rabbinic interpretation, which effectively nullifies the law. By hiring non-Jewish hands to work the land, the landowner can claim to be following the Shemitah by not (himself) cultivating the land—others are doing it for him, and he is not laboring personally.

In his book The Mystery of the Shemitah, Jonathan Cahn makes the case that nations who do not follow the principles of the Shemitah will be judged by God. He applies this warning specifically to America, showing how Ehul 29, the Day of Remission on the Jewish calendar, has coincided with drastic drops in the stock market, credit crises, oil shocks, recessions, sell-offs, and the Great Depression in America. Cahn figures that we finished a Shemitah year, which ended on September 13, 2015. After that is a possible Year of Jubilee, a “super Shemitah,” according to Cahn, if it is the year following seven Shemitah years (7 sets of 7 years). In Cahn’s book, the Year of Jubilee could bring even more of God’s judgment on rebellious nations such as America. Adding to the portents of doom, according to Cahn, are the four blood moonsand two solar eclipses we’ve recently seen.

In The Mystery of the Shemitah, Cahn relates many events concerning the World Trade Center to a Shemitah year: The WTC was conceived in 1945. Groundbreaking occurred in 1966. The twin towers opened in 1973. Terrorists bombed the north tower in 1993. Both towers were destroyed in 2001. The new tower, One World Trade Center, or the Freedom Tower, opened in 2014. Cahn points out that all of these years are Shemitah years.

Author Cahn was careful not to be dogmatic about his predictions of divine judgment on the United States. He did not attempt to predict what, if anything, would happen during the next Shemitah or on the next Day of Remission, September 13. His assertion that America has a covenant relationship with God, much like Israel has, is questionable. His teaching of a seven-year pattern of calamity could be dismissed as mere coincidence. But his call to America to repent and seek salvation in Christ is definitely biblical.

0 Comments

Son of man...

5/7/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture
​The Son of Man title (from Book of #Ezekiel) showed how Jesus emphasized his perfect humanity. In #Daniel, it depicts his #identity as the #Messiah — the anointed One from God and #promised #deliverer #foretold in the Hebrew Bible. Jesus- the perfect God-man would bring in God’s everlasting kingdom for both Jew and Gentile. Jesus had a deep conviction of special mission to the Jewish nation, who were God’s treasured possession (Exodus 19:5). He expressed this so strongly; and careful consideration of his words reveals his strategy: As Paul expressed-His mission was “to the Jew first, and also to the Greek” (Rom1:16; 2:10). Jesus’ concern for Israel was shown in the instructions to the 12 disciples as He sent them on their first preaching mission. “Do not go in the way of the Gentiles,” He said, “and do not enter any city of the Samaritans; but rather go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10:5-6). His ministry was restricted primarily, but not exclusively to the Jews (Matthew 8:1-13). Indeed, in the very same -context- is the prediction that the preaching ministry of the disciples would be extended to the Gentiles; “You shall even be brought before governors and kings for My sake, as a testimony to them and to the Gentiles.” Luke’s Gospel tells of a later preaching mission in which 70 others were sent out two by two (Luke 10:1). -Just as- the 12 apostles symbolically represent the 12 tribes of Israel, the 70 -symbolize- the Gentile nations (In Genesis 10, the descendants of Noah are listed, #70). Rabbinical tradition presumed that this was the total number of nations scattered over the earth after the Tower of Babel, and referred to the “70 Gentile peoples.” #Jesus used this means of #symbolizing his long-range #purpose. (The 12 were sent to heal the sick and announce the #nearness of God’s kingdom. The 70 were sent later on a “training mission” in preparation for their ultimate mission- to the whole world).
0 Comments
<<Previous

    Anew Light Ministries

    CREATING environments through the vehicle of Visual and Expressive ARTS to help plug people into their CREATOR by fostering Spiritual Growth. By combining Therapeutic Art, Christ-Centered CBT techniques, and Integrated Arts in Scriptural Education, I seek to Heal human brokenness and Redeem Fullness through the Transformative Healing Power of The Holy Spirit. 

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    ​




    ​
    Categories

    ​

    All
    000
    000 Sealed
    0MUSIC0
    12
    144
    2022 Prophetic Outlook
    3
    40
    4 Horseman
    7
    70
    Abandoned
    Abomination Of Desolation
    Abraham
    Abram
    A Case For Christ
    Acts
    Adam
    Adam And Eve
    Advocate
    Afflicted
    Agape
    Ahab
    Ahaz
    Alchemy
    Aleph Tav
    Alpha
    Alpha Omega
    America
    Amos
    Andrew
    Angel Of The Covenant
    Angel Of The Lord
    Anointed One
    Antichrist
    Anti Christian Sentiment
    Anti-Christian Sentiment
    Antioch
    Apocalypse
    Apologetics
    Apostle
    Appearing
    Appointed
    Arabs
    Aral Sea
    Aramic
    Archaeology
    Archangel
    Arc Of Covenant
    Ark
    Armageddon
    Arm Of The Lord
    Artists
    Arts
    Ascended
    Ascension Day
    Ash Wednesday
    Assyrian
    Astray
    Astronomers
    Atonement
    Authorship
    Awakening
    Azaryahu
    Baal
    Babylon
    Babylonian Exile
    Babylonians
    Babylonian Talmud
    Baptizes
    Bar Kochba Revolt
    Beatitudes
    Believers
    Bethlehem
    Betrayed
    Biblical Accuracy
    Biblical Authority/Divine Authority
    Biblical Hierarchy
    Birth Of The Book
    Birthpains
    Birth Right
    Blasphemy
    Blessed
    Blessing
    Bloodline
    Blood Moon
    Blood Of Christ
    Body Of Christ
    Bondage
    Book Of 12 Prophets
    Book Of Daniel
    Book Of Zechariah
    Bread Of Life
    Bridegroom
    Bride Of Christ
    Burnt Offering
    Caesar
    Called
    Callings
    Calvary
    Cambyses
    Canaan
    Canaanite
    Captivity
    Chabad
    Charles Horton Cooley
    Child Sacrafice
    Chosen
    Christ
    Christian
    Christian Counseling
    Christian History
    Christophobia
    Chronicles
    Church
    Citizen Of Heaven
    Climate Change
    Colossians
    Coming Of Christ
    Command
    Conquer
    Consciousness
    Consequences
    Constellation
    Constitution
    Conviction
    Corinthians
    Cornerstone
    Corruption
    Counseling
    Counselor
    Covenant
    Covenant Code
    Covenant Of Peace
    Created Order
    Creation
    Creator
    Cross
    Cross Of Mordecai
    Cross References
    Crown Of Thorns
    Crucified
    Crucifixion
    Crushed
    C.S. Lewis
    Daniel
    Darius Persian King
    David
    Davidic Dynasty
    Davidic Offspring
    Day Of The Lord
    Dead Sea
    Dead Sea Scrolls
    Deception
    Degradation
    Deliverance
    Despised
    Destruction
    Deuteronomy
    Digital Age
    Disbelief
    Disciples
    Discipleship
    Discovery
    Displaced Order
    Divine Presence
    Donkey
    Dwelling
    Easter
    Eastern Mysticism
    Eban Alexander
    Ecclesiastes
    Economy
    Education
    Egypt
    Election
    Elevation Worship
    Elijah
    Elisha
    Embodies
    Emmaus Road
    Empower
    Encounter
    End Days
    End Times
    Enlightenment
    Enoch
    Ephesians
    Epiphany
    Epistles
    Eschatology
    Essenes
    Esther
    Eternal Word
    Ethical Navigation
    Ethics
    Evangelism
    Exaltation
    Exile
    Exodus
    Eye Witnesses
    Ezekiel
    Ezra
    Facing God
    Faith
    Fall
    Fallen
    False Prophets
    Famine
    Feasts
    Fertility
    Festivals
    Fig Tree
    Final Teaching
    Financial Gain
    Fire
    Firstborn Son
    First Fruits
    Fish
    Flock
    Flood
    Foresake
    Forgiveness
    Forsaken
    Foundation
    Found Saint
    Freedom
    Freedom Of Speech
    Fruit
    Fruitful
    Fulfilled Messianic Prophecy
    Fulfillment
    Fullness Of Gentiles
    Gabriel
    Galatians
    Galilee
    Galilee Sea
    Garden Of Eden
    Gelatians
    Gender Ideology
    Genealogy
    Genealogy Of Jesus The Messiah
    Genesis
    Glorified
    Glorify
    Glory
    God
    Godhead
    God's Design
    God's Law
    God's Plan
    Gods Plan
    God's Timing
    God's Tough Love
    God's Word
    Gods Word
    Gods Wrath
    God The Father
    Gog And Magog
    Good Friday
    Good News
    Good Samaritan
    Gospel
    Government
    Grace
    Great Tribulation
    Greek
    Grief
    Group Identity Politics
    Guilt
    Habakkuk
    Haggai
    Harbinger
    Hardening
    Havdalah
    Healed
    Heartbeat
    Hebrew Messiah
    Hebrews
    Hebrew Scripture/Old Testament
    Heresy
    Hezekiah
    High Priest
    Hillsong United
    Holiness
    Holy
    Holy Spirit
    Homeland
    Hope
    Hosanna
    Hosea
    Hoshea
    House Of David
    Human Needs
    Human Speech
    Humble
    Humility
    Hypocrisy
    I Am
    Idols
    Idoltry
    Illuminate
    Image Of God
    Imitation Of The Divine
    Immanuel
    Incarnation
    Inclusion
    Ingrafting Tree
    Iniquities
    Intercessor
    Intervention
    Intolerance
    Iran Alliance
    Isaac
    Isaiah
    Israel
    Jacob
    Jacob Named Israel
    James
    Jehovah
    Jehovah Jared
    Jehovah Shalom
    Jeremiah
    Jericho
    Jerusalem
    Jesus
    Jesus Christ
    Jesus Identity
    Jesus Ministry
    Jesus Of Nazareth
    Jesus' Wisdom
    Jewish Holidays
    Jezebel
    Jireh
    Job
    Joel
    John
    John The Baptist
    Jonah
    Jonathan Cahn
    Jordan Peterson
    Jordan River
    Joseph
    Josephus
    Joshua
    Josiah
    Joy
    Jubilee
    Judah
    Judaism
    Judas
    Judas Hangs Himself
    Jude
    Judea
    Judgement
    Judges
    Justice
    Justified
    Kabbalistic Literature
    King David
    Kingdom
    Kingdom Divided
    Kingdom Of God
    Kingdom Of Heaven
    Kingdom Of Judah
    Kingdom Of Peace
    King Herod
    Kings
    King Saul
    King Solomon
    Kohanim
    Lamb
    Lamentations
    Lampstands
    Land
    Land Of The Living
    Languages
    Last Days
    Last Supper
    Law And Prophets
    Law Of Moses
    Lazarus
    Leadership
    Lee Strobel
    Levi
    Levite
    Levitical Priesthood
    Leviticus
    Liberation
    Light Of The World
    Lion
    Lion Of Judah
    Living Document
    Living God
    Living Water
    Locusts
    Logos
    Lord Will Provide
    Lost
    Lost Sheep
    Luke
    Malachi
    Manifestation
    Man Of Lawlessness
    Manuscripts
    Mark
    Martyrdom
    Mary Magdalene
    Masada
    Mashiach
    Masoretic Scribes
    Matthew
    Matthias
    Matzo
    Melchizedek
    Mental Health
    Mercy
    Messenger Of God
    Messianic Age
    Micah
    Midrash
    Miracles
    Mocking
    Morality
    Morning Star
    Mosaic Law
    Moses
    Mother Godness
    Mother Mary
    Mount Carmel
    Mount Ebal
    Mount Of Olives
    Mount Olives
    Mount Sinai
    Mount Zion
    *MUSIC*
    Music Videos
    Mustard Seed
    Mysteries Of God
    Mystery
    Nahum
    Narions
    Narrow Gate
    Nations
    Nature God
    NDE
    Nebuchadnezzar's Dream
    Negev
    Nehemiah
    New Age
    New Age Movement (NAM)
    New Commandment
    New Covenant
    New Humanity
    New Jerusalem
    New Life
    New Song
    New Star
    New Testament
    Newton
    Nicodemus
    Noah
    Numbers
    Oath
    Oliver Discourse
    Olivet
    Omega
    Omnipresent
    One For Israel
    Ophrah
    Opression
    Oral Law
    Order And Chaos
    Overcome
    Pagan
    Pagan Romans
    Palm Branches
    Palm Sunday
    Parable Of The Sheep And Goats
    Parable Of The Tenants
    Parable Of The Ten Virgins
    Parable Of The Two Sons
    Parables
    Paradigm
    Paschal
    Passover
    Paul
    Peace
    Peace Court
    Peniel
    Pentanteuch
    Pentecost
    Penuel
    Persecution
    Persian Empire
    Pesach
    Peter
    Peter's Denial
    Pharisees
    Pharoah
    Philippians
    Physics
    Pidyon
    Pierced
    Pineal
    Plague
    Podcast
    Polemics
    Political
    Political Corectness
    Politics
    Praise
    Prayer
    Prevail
    Priests
    Prince Of Peace
    Problem Of Perception
    Proclaim
    Prolife
    Promise Land
    Promises
    Prophecy
    Prophets
    Prosperity
    Proverbs
    Provide
    Psalm
    Punishment
    Purpose
    Pursuit Of The Divine
    Pursuit Of Truth
    Quantum Computer
    Quantum Mechanics
    Queen Of Sheba
    Rabbinic Tradition
    Ransom
    Rapture
    Rebirth
    Rebuild
    Recognize
    Reconciliation
    Recovery
    Redeemed
    Redeemer
    Redemption
    Red Nova
    Reforms
    Regenerate
    Rehoboam
    Rejected
    Rejection
    Rejoice
    Religious Authority
    Remnant
    Renew
    Repentance
    Republic
    Restoration
    Restores
    Resurrection
    Return
    Revealed
    Revealing
    Reveals
    Revelation
    Reversal
    Revival
    Revolutionary
    Righteousness
    Right To Life
    Risen
    River Of Life
    Roman Empire
    Roman Jewish Wars
    Romans
    Root
    Russia
    Ruth
    Sabbath
    Sacrafice
    Sacrificial Lamb
    Sadducees
    Salt And Light
    Salvation
    Samaria
    Samaritan
    Samuel
    Sanctification
    Sanctify
    Sanctity Of Life
    Saul
    Saved
    Saves
    Saving
    Savior
    Scattered
    Scribe
    Scroll Of The Lamb
    Sealed
    Seals
    Second Coming
    Secret
    Sedar
    Self Glorification
    Self-glorification
    Semetic
    Senai
    Sensus Divinitatis
    Separation
    Septuagint
    Sermon On The Mount
    Serpent
    Servant
    Seven Seals
    Seven Stars
    Shabbat
    Shalom
    Sheep
    Shekinah
    Shemitah
    Shephelah
    Shepherd
    Shiloh
    Sign Of Jonah
    Signs
    Simon
    Sin
    Sinai
    Sistine Chapel
    Slavery
    Sodom
    Solomon
    Song Of Deborah
    Son Of David
    Son Of God
    Son Of Living God
    Son Of Man
    Sorrows
    Source
    Sovereighnty
    Sowing Of Peace
    Spirit
    Spiritism
    Spirit Of Truth
    Spiritual Gifts
    Spiritual Residents
    Spiritual Truth
    Stars
    Stone
    Stricken
    Struggle
    Stumble
    Suffer
    Suffering Servent
    Sukkot
    Supernatural
    Supress Truth
    Symbolism
    Symbolizes
    Synagogues
    Syria
    Tabernacles
    Talmud
    Tamar
    Tanakh
    Tate Britain
    Temple
    Ten Commandment
    Tents
    Testify
    Testimony
    The 99
    The Great Commission
    The Great Tribulation
    The Jewish War
    The Seals
    Thessalonians
    The Word
    Third Eye
    Tim
    Timothy
    Titus
    Torah
    Tower Of Babel
    Transcends
    Transfiguration
    Transfiguration Of Jesus
    Transformation
    Transgressions
    Tree
    Tree Of Knowledge
    Tree Of Life
    Tribalism
    Tribe Of Benjamin
    Tribe Of Judah
    Tribe Of Levi
    Tribe Of Simeon
    Tribes
    Tribulation
    Trinity
    True God
    True Israel
    True Son
    Trumpets
    Trust
    Turkey
    Twelve Stars Of Revelation
    Twelve Tribes
    Unbelief
    Unconditional Love
    Ungodliness
    Unity
    Universalism
    Unjustly Accused
    Unleash Creatures
    Unleavened Bread
    Values
    Victorious
    Victory
    Vine
    Virgin Mary
    Virtue Of TRUTH
    Vision
    Visions
    Visual Depiction
    Walking On Water
    Walks With God
    Warning
    Wedding Banquet
    Wellsprings Of Knowledge
    Wheat
    Why Is The Bible Not Just Another "Book?"
    Wilderness
    Wilderness Of Zin
    Will Of God
    Wisdom
    Witness
    Womb
    Wondaring
    Wonderful Counselor
    Word Made Flesh
    Word Of God
    Work Of Christ
    Worship Music
    Worthy
    Wounded
    Wrath
    Wrestles With God
    Written Law
    Yabbok
    Yahweh
    Yehud
    Yeshua
    Yom Kippur
    Yom Teruah
    Zacchaeus
    Zeal For God
    Zealots
    Zebedee
    Zebulun
    Zechariah
    Zephaniah
    Zerubbabel
    Zion

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Picture

Picture

Picture
Picture
Picture